Literature DB >> 9821346

Sensitivity to changes in level and envelope patterns across frequency.

V M Richards1, J J Lentz.   

Abstract

In the first experiment, two measurements were compared--sensitivity to across-frequency changes in level and sensitivity to across-frequency changes in the modulation phase of SAM tones. For the level task, multi-tone stimuli composed of 2-80 tones ranging in frequency from 200 to 5000 Hz were used. For the phase task, the same frequency range was used, and 2-80 SAM tones were tested. For the level task, observers discriminated between a multi-tone, equal-amplitude standard and one of two signals--a one-step or an up-down signal. The one-step signal had higher levels at low frequencies and lower levels at high frequencies. The up-down signal had components with levels that varied high-low-high-low. For the phase task, the standard was the sum of SAM tones with identical modulator phases across frequency. The one-step signal had a common modulator phase at low frequencies and a different common modulator phase at high frequencies. The up-down signal had modulator phases that varied lag-lead-lag-lead. The results suggest that sensitivity to across-frequency changes in level and modulation phase reflect similar initial processing stages. In a second experiment, SAM tones were used, and psychometric functions were measured for the level task, the phase task, and a condition in which changes in level and modulator phase were both present. The standard was "flat," and an up-down signal was to be detected. For one observer, the data suggest that level and phase information are independently represented. For the other two observers, interactions between the two features of the stimuli are apparent. A multiple-looks model was moderately successful in accounting for the data.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9821346     DOI: 10.1121/1.423883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  2 in total

1.  Spectral profile cues in comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.

Authors:  Braden N Maxwell; Virginia M Richards; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.