Literature DB >> 9821039

Comparison of grading systems for estimating the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma.

A Usubütün1, M C Uygur, A Ayhan, C Toklu, A Sahin, H Ozen, S Ruacan.   

Abstract

In this study histologic slides of 165 patients who were diagnosed as RCC between 1983 and 1993 were re-evaluated and each tumour was graded according to Thoenes, Fuhrman, Arner and Skinner's grading systems. According to Thoenes' system, patients with grade (G) 2 and 3 tumours had significantly shorter survival compared to patients with G 1 tumours. The survival difference between the subgroups of Fuhrman and Skinner's grading systems did not reach statistical significance. When the histologic differentiation was grouped as low grade (G 1&2) and high grade (G 3&4) tumours in Fuhrman and Skinner's systems, a statistically significant difference was noted between the groups in terms of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9821039     DOI: 10.1007/bf02550216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  15 in total

1.  Renal adenocarcinoma; morphology--grading of malignancy--prognosis. A study of 197 cases.

Authors:  O Arner; C Blanck; T von Schreeb
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl       Date:  1965

Review 2.  Prognostic factors in renal cancer.

Authors:  J B Thrasher; D F Paulson
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 3.  Classic and modern prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma. Review of the literature.

Authors:  T Strohmeyer; R Ackermann
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Stratification of risk factors in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  C Selli; W M Hinshaw; B H Woodard; D F Paulson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Well differentiated (grade 1) clear cell renal carcinoma.

Authors:  K M Tomera; G M Farrow; M M Lieber
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas and carcinomas). The basic cytological and histopathological elements and their use for diagnostics.

Authors:  W Thoenes; S Störkel; H J Rumpelt
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  Multivariate evaluation of prognostic determinants for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Takashi; Y Nakano; T Sakata; K Miyake; N Hamajima
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Renal carcinoma: computer analysis of 96 patients treated by nephrectomy.

Authors:  R J Boxer; J Waisman; M M Lieber; F M Mampaso; D G Skinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Prognostic factors and value of adjunctive nephrectomy in patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S Naito; K Kimiya; N Sakamoto; T Soejima; T Ueda; J Kumazawa; Y Osada; T Kurozumi; K Sagiyama; A Ariyoshi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

1.  18-F fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography as a pathological grade predictor for renal clear cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Noda; Masayuki Kanematsu; Satoshi Goshima; Natsuko Suzui; Yoshinobu Hirose; Kengo Matsunaga; Hironori Nishibori; Hiroshi Kondo; Haruo Watanabe; Hiroshi Kawada; Nobuyuki Kawai; Yukichi Tanahashi; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.