Literature DB >> 9820889

Feed-conversion ratio of finisher pigs in the USA.

W C Losinger1.   

Abstract

Although the feed-conversion ratio is recognized as a prominent indicator of profitability for pork producers, only 212 (50.7%) of 418 producers who were asked the feed-conversion ratio for finisher pigs provided a response during the USA National Animal Health Monitoring System 1995 National Swine Study. Of these, 126 (59.4%) producers furnished a feed-conversion ratio which they characterized as having been calculated from records, while 86 (40.6%) gave a response that they characterized as estimated or guessed. Feed-conversion ratios ranged from 2.18 to 5.91 kg of feed fed for each kg of live-body weight gained during the grower/finisher phase, with a mean of 3.28 and a standard deviation of 0.52. Stepwise regression revealed the following management factors to be associated with improved feed-conversion ratios: > or = 3 different rations fed during the grower/finisher phase (P < 0.01); no rations mixed on the farm (P < 0.05); and not giving chlortetracycline in feed or water as a disease preventive or growth promotant (P < 0.01). In addition, operations where > or = 3000 pigs entered the grower/finisher-production phase during the six-month period prior to interview had a better mean feed-conversion ratio than operations where < 3000 pigs entered the grower/finisher phase (P < 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9820889     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00094-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  5 in total

1.  Mixed models applied to the study of variation of grower-finisher mortality and culling rates of a large swine production system.

Authors:  A J Larriestra; D G Maes; J Deen; R B Morrison
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Factors affecting the daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio of pigs in grow-finishing units: the case of a company.

Authors:  C R Pierozan; P S Agostini; J Gasa; A K Novais; C P Dias; R S K Santos; M Pereira; J G Nagi; J B Alves; C A Silva
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-03-01

3.  Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature.

Authors:  Jinfeng Chang; Shushi Peng; Philippe Ciais; Marielle Saunois; Shree R S Dangal; Mario Herrero; Petr Havlík; Hanqin Tian; Philippe Bousquet
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Managing variability in decision making in swine growing-finishing units.

Authors:  Piero da Silva Agostini; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla; Carlos de Blas; Alan G Fahey; Caio Abercio da Silva; Josep Gasa
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.146

5.  Production impact of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection on fattening pigs in Norway.

Authors:  Chiek Er; Eystein Skjerve; Edgar Brun; Peer Ola Hofmo; Tore Framstad; Bjørn Lium
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.159

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.