Literature DB >> 9820661

Analysis of chromosomal alterations induced by asbestos and ceramic fibers.

E Dopp1, D Schiffmann.   

Abstract

Asbestos and other mineral fibers have long been known as carcinogenic agents. However, the primary mechanisms of fiber-induced carcinogenesis still remain unclear. We have investigated mitotic disturbances caused by amosite, crocidolite, and chrysotile in Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) fibroblasts. We also analyzed micronucleus formation as a result of mitotic disturbances, and carried out a characterization of the induced micronucleus population by kinetochore staining. In addition, the spindle fiber morphology was examined. Supravital UV-microscopy was used to analyze changes in chromatin structure, impaired chromatid separation and blocked cytokinesis. All three fiber types induced micronuclei in SHE cells with a high frequency (up to 200 MN/2000 cells; dose range: 0.1-5.0 microg/cm2) in a dose-dependent manner with a maximum between 48 and 66 h. Kinetochore staining revealed that 48% of fiber-induced micronuclei reacted positively. Furthermore, spindle deformation was observed in cells with disturbed meta- and anaphases while the spindle fiber morphology appeared unchanged. Our results show that asbestos fibers may cause both loss as well as breakage of chromosomes in the absence of direct interaction with spindle fibers. In addition, we analyzed the induction of micronuclei, hyperdiploidy and chromosome breakage in human amniotic fluid cells (AFC) in vitro by amosite, chrysotile and crocidolite asbestos and ceramic fibers. The response of human (AFC) and rodent (SHE) cells to fiber treatment was compared using the micronucleus assay. AFC were much less susceptible than SHE cells to the induction of micronuclei by mineral fibers. The application of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with tandem DNA probes yielded more detailed informations about specific structural chromosome aberrations in the 1(cen-q12) and 9(cen-q12) regions and about abnormal numbers of chromosomes in interphase AFC. Using this FISH approach we found a statistically significant increase of chromosomal breakage in the pericentric heterochromatin regions of chromosomes 1 and 9 in AFC after exposure to asbestos and ceramic fibers. The number of hyperdiploid cells was also significantly increased. These results show that asbestos as well as ceramic fibers are inducers of structural and numerical chromosomal alterations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9820661     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00063-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  11 in total

Review 1.  Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases.

Authors:  Sarah X L Huang; Marie-Claude Jaurand; David W Kamp; John Whysner; Tom K Hei
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  Cytogenetic analysis of embryos generated from in vitro matured mouse oocytes reveals an increase in micronuclei due to chromosome fragmentation.

Authors:  S M Junk; A R Murch; A Dharmarajan; J L Yovich
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Chromosomal damage in two species of aquatic turtles (Emys orbicularis and Mauremys caspica) inhabiting contaminated sites in Azerbaijan.

Authors:  Cole W Matson; Grigoriy Palatnikov; Arif Islamzadeh; Thomas J McDonald; Robin L Autenrieth; K C Donnelly; John W Bickham
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Genome-wide Gene-Asbestos Exposure Interaction Association Study Identifies a Common Susceptibility Variant on 22q13.31 Associated with Lung Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Chen-Yu Liu; Isabelle Stücker; Chu Chen; Gary Goodman; Michelle K McHugh; Anthony M D'Amelio; Carol J Etzel; Su Li; Xihong Lin; David C Christiani
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  ROS-mediated genotoxicity of asbestos-cement in mammalian lung cells in vitro.

Authors:  Elke Dopp; Santosh Yadav; Furquan Ahmad Ansari; Kunal Bhattacharya; Ursula von Recklinghausen; Ursula Rauen; Klaus Rödelsperger; Behnaz Shokouhi; Stefan Geh; Qamar Rahman
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Dielectric changes in membrane properties and cell interiors of human mesothelial cells in vitro after crocidolite asbestos exposure.

Authors:  E Dopp; L Jonas; B Nebe; A Budde; E Knippel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Chromosome nondisjunction during bipolar mitoses of binucleated intermediates promote aneuploidy formation along with multipolar mitoses rather than chromosome loss in micronuclei induced by asbestos.

Authors:  Tianwei Zhang; Lei Lv; Yun Huang; Xiaohui Ren; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 8.  An updated review of the genotoxicity of respirable crystalline silica.

Authors:  Paul J A Borm; Paul Fowler; David Kirkland
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 9.400

9.  DNA copy number loss and allelic imbalance at 2p16 in lung cancer associated with asbestos exposure.

Authors:  E Kettunen; M Aavikko; P Nymark; S Ruosaari; H Wikman; E Vanhala; K Salmenkivi; R Pirinen; A Karjalainen; E Kuosma; S Anttila
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Distinct affinity of nuclear proteins to the surface of chrysotile and crocidolite.

Authors:  Yurika Kubo; Hiroyuki Takenaka; Hirotaka Nagai; Shinya Toyokuni
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.114

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.