Literature DB >> 9820290

Histochemical and molecular analyses of distraction osteogenesis in a mouse model.

B K Tay1, A X Le, S E Gould, J A Helms.   

Abstract

A tibial lengthening scheme in the mouse was used to study the molecular and cellular events regulating tissue regeneration during distraction osteogenesis. Here, we report on the surgical technique and frame design and describe the histochemical and molecular aspects of distraction during different phases of treatment. A total of 26 mice were used in this study. The treatment protocol was divided into a latency period of 7 days, a phase of active distraction that lasted 10 days with a distraction rate of 0.42 mm/day, and a maturation phase of 9 days. During latency, the distraction site resembled a stabilized fracture callus on both a histochemical and a molecular level. During active distraction, the gap was characterized by a central fibrous interzone bordered by primary matrix fronts, regenerate bone aligned with the distraction force, parallel columns of vascular sinusoids, and a medullary cavity. Alkaline phosphatase activity was detected in the endosteal and periosteal surfaces of the bone ends. Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase staining revealed that osteoclasts remodeled the bone regenerate as it formed. Collagen type I was expressed in the periosteum and the primary matrix front during distraction, whereas collagen type-II transcripts were localized to discrete regions on the periosteal surfaces, immediately adjacent to the osteotomy ends. Collagen type-II transcripts were not detected in the fibrous interzone. During the maturation phase, cells within the fibrous interzone expressed collagen type I and exhibited abundant alkaline phosphatase activity, suggesting that they had begun to terminally differentiate. Collectively, these data demonstrate the utility of a mouse model to study the molecular and cellular bases for the regeneration and remodeling of tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9820290     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100160518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  19 in total

1.  Relationships between tissue dilatation and differentiation in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Michael T Longaker; Dennis R Carter
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 2.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Are endogenous BMPs necessary for bone healing during distraction osteogenesis?

Authors:  Norine Alam; René St-Arnaud; Dominique Lauzier; Vicki Rosen; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Fixation stability dictates the differentiation pathway of periosteal progenitor cells in fracture repair.

Authors:  Yusuke Hagiwara; Nathaniel A Dyment; Xi Jiang; Huang Jiang Ping; Cheryl Ackert-Bicknell; Douglas J Adams; David W Rowe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Correlations between local strains and tissue phenotypes in an experimental model of skeletal healing.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Kristy T Salisbury Palomares; Ryan E Gleason; Daniel L Bellin; Karen B Chien; Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Pui L Leong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Direct bone formation during distraction osteogenesis does not require TNFalpha receptors and elevated serum TNFalpha fails to inhibit bone formation in TNFR1 deficient mice.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wahl; James Aronson; Lichu Liu; Robert A Skinner; Mike J Miller; Gael E Cockrell; John L Fowlkes; Kathryn M Thrailkill; Robert C Bunn; Martin J J Ronis; Charles K Lumpkin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Altered fracture repair in the absence of MMP9.

Authors:  Céline Colnot; Zachary Thompson; Theodore Miclau; Zena Werb; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms controlling bone formation during fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Z S Ai-Aql; A S Alagl; D T Graves; L C Gerstenfeld; T A Einhorn
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Bone formation during distraction osteogenesis is dependent on both VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 signaling.

Authors:  Kimberly A Jacobsen; Zainab S Al-Aql; Chao Wan; Jennifer L Fitch; Stephanie N Stapleton; Zachary D Mason; Robert M Cole; Shawn R Gilbert; Thomas L Clemens; Elise F Morgan; Thomas A Einhorn; Louis C Gerstenfeld
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Optimal bone fracture repair requires 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its effector molecule FAM57B2.

Authors:  Corine Martineau; Roy Pascal Naja; Abdallah Husseini; Bachar Hamade; Martin Kaufmann; Omar Akhouayri; Alice Arabian; Glenville Jones; René St-Arnaud
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.