Literature DB >> 9820208

Neurosensory deficit and functional impairment after sagittal ramus osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study.

M August1, J Marchena, J Donady, L Kaban.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated persistent neurosensory deficit (NSD) and functional sensory deficit (FSD) after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) and their association with patient age at time of operation and eight additional variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients more than 2 years post-BSSO were identified and stratified by age: group 1, 10 to 19 years (n=16); group 2, 20 to 29 years (n=24); group 3, 30 to 39 years (n=30); group 4, older than 40 years (n=15). Mean mandibular advancement, incidence of "bad split," excessive intraoperative bleeding, nerve manipulation, removal of third molars, use of rigid fixation, simultaneous mandibular procedures, and associated systemic disease were documented for each group. A questionnaire modified from Zuniga was used to document the presence of persistent (2 years or longer) NSD and FSD. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences between groups. Logistic regression was used to evaluate each variable and determine its association with persistent NSD and FSD.
RESULTS: Persistent NSD by age was: group 1, 81%; group 2, 46%; group 3, 73%; group 4, 87%. The trend of increasing persistence with increasing age was not significant (P=.248). However, persistent FSD with increasing age was highly significant (P=.003). The incidence of FSD in group 4 was statistically greater than in the other groups (P < .001; P < .001; P=.004, respectively). Logistic regression identified patient age and "bad splits" as associated with FSD (P=.003; P=.015, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of persistent FSD more than 2 years post-BSSO increases with increasing age in a predictable and highly significant manner. Presurgical counseling should address this issue. FSD is also significantly associated with "bad splits." No other variables were found to be significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9820208     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90595-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Vinícius de Carvalho Machado; Björn Gjelvold
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

2.  Mandibular sagittal split osteotomy - A modified technique to reduce postoperative labiomental paraesthesia.

Authors:  M Manisali; F B Naini
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C Phillips; S H Kim; M Tucker; T A Turvey
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Piezoosteotomy in orthognathic surgery versus conventional saw and chisel osteotomy.

Authors:  C A Landes; S Stübinger; A Ballon; R Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09

5.  Low-level laser effect in patients with neurosensory impairment of mandibular nerve after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Randomized clinical trial, controlled by placebo.

Authors:  Alberto Führer-Valdivia; Alfredo Noguera-Pantoja; Valeria Ramírez-Lobos; Pedro Solé-Ventura
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-07-01

6.  Transversal Width of Mandibular Bone and Neurosensory Disturbance after Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy.

Authors:  Yuichiro Takaku; Masayuki Takano; Shuichiro Yamashita; Kenichi Fukuda
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2017-10-13

7.  Risk factors of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Albraa Badr Alolayan; Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.