Literature DB >> 9819586

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions].

B Guillonneau1, X Cathelineau, E Barret, F Rozet, G Vallancien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the technical feasibility of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, its carcinological efficacy and per- and post-operative morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed radical prostatectomy using a new laparoscopic technique in 28 patients between February 1 and August 31, 1998.
RESULTS: Radical prostatectomy was achieved totally by a laparoscopic approach in 24 patients (86%). No conversion was required in the last 14 patients. In 9 patients (32%) ilio-obturator node resection was also performed as indicated by preoperative extension work-up. Mean operative time was 270 minutes. The only major complication was one rectal wound (patient n degree 8) which had a benign course after suturing under laparoscopy. The bladder catheter was removed a mean 7.7 days after the procedure. Five patients (18%) required transfusions (mean 2.7 units, range 2-3). Rapid discharge on day 3 was possible due to rapid pain relief postoperatively. Tumor classes were pT2 in 26 patients, NO in 9, NX in 17. The surgical border was doubtful at the apex in one case. The last prostate specific antigen assay was below detectable levels (< 0.1 ng/ml) in 16 patients (89%) among the 18 with levels know prior to the procedure. Continence was assessable in 20 patients after a 1 to 6 month follow-up. Continence was perfect in 18 patients and becoming so in 12. Sexual activity was not assessed in this series due to the short follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy can be reasonably performed as a routine laparoscopic procedure by a well-trained team. The cancerological results in this series were equivalent to those with conventional retropubic surgery and morbidity was very low. Improved operative vision was considerable, allowing much more precise dissection. The laparoscopic technique appears to be an important improvement for radical prostatectomy and should help improve functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9819586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Presse Med        ISSN: 0755-4982            Impact factor:   1.228


  16 in total

1.  Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Xing-Huan Wang; Yi-Long Wu; Huai-Peng Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Surgical Management of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer with Review of Literature and Evolving Evidence.

Authors:  Ahmed Saeed Goolam; Alfredo Harb-De la Rosa; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-13

3.  Surgery: laparoscopic prostatectomy: learning curve and cancer control.

Authors:  Steven L Chang; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Is laparoscopy dying for radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Eric Barret; François Rozet; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Modified apical dissection of the prostate improves early continence in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Ke-Bing Wang; Xiao-Yong Pu; Xiang-Fu Zhou; Jian-Guang Qiu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  [Prevention of postoperative urinary stress incontinence].

Authors:  M A Reiter; A Haferkamp; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; James A Eastham; Fernando P Secin; Javier Romero Otero; Angel Serio; Jason Stasi; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Fernando P Secin; Angel M Cronin; Darren Katz; Fernando Bianco; Kinjal Vora; Victor Reuter; Andrew J Vickers; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: 10 years of cases at Ramathibodi Hospital.

Authors:  Kun Sirisopana; Pocharapong Jenjitranant; Premsant Sangkum; Kittinut Kijvikai; Suthep Pacharatakul; Charoen Leenanupun; Wachira Kochakarn; Wisoot Kongchareonsombat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.