Literature DB >> 9819337

Predator-induced nest site preference: safe nests allow courtship in sticklebacks.

.   

Abstract

Reproductive activities often increase the susceptibility of individuals to predators. Individuals may be able to reduce this risk of predation, however, by their choice of breeding habitat, as the structural complexity of habitats is known to affect predator foraging success. Here we show that the presence of predators induces a preference for structurally complex nest sites over open ones in male three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. To investigate whether this predator-induced nest site preference can decrease the known negative effect of predators on courtship activity, we recorded the reduction in courtship activity during predator presentations for males in vegetated and open nest sites. Habitat structure affected the response to a predator when males were in competition. A male in a vegetated site reduced courtship activity less than a male in an open site. Habitat had no effect on courtship when males were solitary, however. This suggests that male-male competition and the possibility of losing mating opportunities to other males affect risk taking. Females, who were unaware of the predator, preferred the male in the vegetated site, which showed less reduction in courtship, when the males were exposed to a predator, but chose randomly between the males when the predator was absent. Thus, a preference for vegetated nest sites under predation risk may be beneficial not only by increasing the probability of survival, but also by reducing the negative impact of predators on courtship activity and mating probability. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9819337     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

1.  Sexual selection and the physiological consequences of habitat choice by a fiddler crab.

Authors:  Bengt J Allen; Jeffrey S Levinton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Influence of weather on gobbling activity of male wild turkeys.

Authors:  Patrick H Wightman; James A Martin; John C Kilgo; Emily Rushton; Bret A Collier; Michael J Chamberlain
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Helper response to experimentally manipulated predation risk in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher.

Authors:  Dik Heg; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Risk-sensitive mating decisions in a visually compromised environment.

Authors:  Bob B M Wong; Marja Järvenpää; Kai Lindström
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  No evidence for UV-based nest-site selection in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Ricarda Modarressie; Theo C M Bakker
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Hypoxia increases the risk of egg predation in a nest-guarding fish.

Authors:  Karin H Olsson; Charlotta Kvarnemo; Maria Norevik Andrén; Therése Larsson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  The relationship between male sexual signals, cognitive performance, and mating success in stickleback fish.

Authors:  Ross Minter; Jason Keagy; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Nest-site selection in a fish species with paternal care.

Authors:  Theo C M Bakker; Beat Mundwiler
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  The hunter and the hunted-A 3D analysis of predator-prey interactions between three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and larvae of different prey fishes.

Authors:  Jorrit Lucas; Albert Ros; Sarah Gugele; Julian Dunst; Juergen Geist; Alexander Brinker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Flexible mate choice when mates are rare and time is short.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Emily G Weigel; Megan Head; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.