Literature DB >> 9819080

Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS) applied to laparoscopic gastric banding patients.

F Favretti1, G B Cadiere, G Segato, L Busetto, A Loffredo, M Vertruyen, G Enzi, D Caniato, F De Marchi, M Lise.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The definition of success and failure of a bariatric procedure should include weight loss as well as improvement in comorbidity and quality of life assessment. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), introduced by Oria and Moorhead in 1997, seems to provide a standard for comparison in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.
METHODS: 180 morbidly obese and super-obese patients, who underwent laparoscopic gastric banding (lap-band) at our institutions and had a follow-up >18 months (19-55 months) were evaluated with BAROS.
RESULTS: The patients were divided into four outcome groups (failure, fair, good, and excellent) based on a scoring table that adds or subtracts points while evaluating three main areas: percentage of excess weight loss, changes in medical conditions, and assessment of quality of life. Points were deducted for complications and reoperative surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The BAROS outcome system has proved to be a useful instrument in evaluating midterm results in our series of lap-band patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9819080     DOI: 10.1381/096089298765554052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  17 in total

1.  Open and laparoscopic surgical modalities for the management of obesity.

Authors:  Philip R Schauer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Content identification of the IWQOL-Lite with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Authors:  Annie Tessier; Nancy E Mayo; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life and alteration in comorbidity following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  M Titi; J T Jenkins; P Modak; D J Galloway
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Quality of life and bariatric surgery: a systematic review of short- and long-term results and comparison with community norms.

Authors:  L C H Raaijmakers; S Pouwels; S E M Thomassen; S W Nienhuijs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Comparative study of five different surgical techniques for the treatment of morbid obesity using BAROS.

Authors:  João Batista Marchesini; Jean Ricardo Nicareta
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Analysis of health-related quality-of-life instruments measuring the impact of bariatric surgery: systematic review of the instruments used and their content validity.

Authors:  Raed Tayyem; Abdulmajid Ali; John Atkinson; Colin R Martin
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Quality of life following laparoscopic gastric banding in patients with morbid obesity.

Authors:  S M Freys; H Tigges; J Heimbucher; K H Fuchs; M Fein; A Thiede
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Prospective evaluation and 7-year follow-up of Swedish adjustable gastric banding in adults with extreme obesity.

Authors:  Bruno M Balsiger; Daniel Ernst; Daniel Giachino; Ruedi Bachmann; Andreas Glaettli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Open-surgery management of morbid obesity: old experience-new techniques.

Authors:  Bernhard Husemann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Quality of life in morbidly obese patients after surgical weight loss.

Authors:  Johann F Kinzl; Maria Schrattenecker; Christian Traweger; Franz Aigner; Michaela Fiala; Wilfried Biebl
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.