Literature DB >> 9818341

Comparative study of corneal topographic changes after 3.0 mm beveled and hinged clear corneal incisions.

C Vass1, R Menapace, G Rainer, O Findl, I Steineck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the corneal topographic changes after cataract surgery using 2 types of clear corneal incisions (CCIs).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Austria.
METHODS: This prospective, unmasked, nonrandomized study comprised 64 eyes scheduled for cataract surgery; 29 eyes received a temporal sutureless 3.0 mm corneal beveled CCI and 35 eyes, a temporal sutureless 3.0 mm hinged CCI. Preoperatively and 1 week, 1 and 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively, corneal topography was recorded by computer-assisted videokeratoscopy (TMS-1, Computed Anatomy, Inc.). Data were evaluated by batch-by-batch analyses of the paired differences between these records. The significance of topographic changes was calculated by paired Wilcoxon tests, and group comparisons were made using Wilcoxon tests.
RESULTS: In both groups, there was statistically significant horizontal flattening and lower corneal steepening (P < .01). The horizontal flattening decreased between 1 week and 1 year, from -0.6 to -0.3 diopter (D) in the beveled-incision group and -0.7 to -0.4 D in the hinged-incision group. Vertical steepening was significant in the lower corneal region and decreased between 1 week and 1 year, from 0.3 to 0.2 D. Group comparisons revealed significant differences in an oblique lower temporal semimeridian, with 0.1 to 0.3 D more steepening after the hinged incision than after the beveled incision (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: There were only minimal differences between beveled and hinged CCIs in surgically induced corneal shape changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9818341     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80173-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

1.  [Analysis of optical parameters after cataract surgery and implantation of foldable lens].

Authors:  B Falkenberg; A Kutschan; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Incisions for biaxial and coaxial microincision cataract surgery].

Authors:  M Müller; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. A critical appraisal].

Authors:  R M Menapace; H B Dick
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  The Auckland cataract study: co-morbidity, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes in a public hospital service.

Authors:  Andrew F Riley; Tahira Y Malik; Christina N Grupcheva; Michael J Fisk; Jennifer P Craig; Charles N McGhee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Predictive Value of Excellent Uncorrected Visual Acuity Post-Operative Day One After Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan W Young; Nathan W Law; Daniel C Tu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-23

6.  Comparison of Postoperative Corneal Astigmatism Induced by Two Different Corneal Incisions during Microincisional Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Melisa Zisan Karslioglu; Cem Kesim; Ayse Yildiz Tas; Murat Hasanreisoglu; Orkun Muftuoglu; Afsun Sahin
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2021-02-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.