J S Lee1, B S Oum, B J Lee, S H Lee. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) in correcting astigmatism of more than -2.00 diopters (D) in eyes with low, high, and extreme myopia. SETTING: Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea. METHODS: Eighty-five patients (110 eyes) whose spherical error ranged from -3.00 to -13.00 D and cylinder ranged from -2.00 to -5.50 D had PARK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser; follow-up was 6 months. All cases of myopic astigmatism were treated using the elliptical method and multizone ablation technique. Eyes were divided into 3 groups: low myopia, less than 6.00 D (n = 47); high myopia, from 6.25 to 10.00 D (n = 43); extreme myopia, over 10.25 D (n = 20). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate the astigmatic change. RESULTS: By vector analysis, the success rate of astigmatic correction was more predictable in the low and high myopia groups than in the extreme myopia group (P < .05). There was little improvement in astigmatism in the extreme myopia group. CONCLUSION: Using PARK to correct astigmatism greater than -2.00 D in eyes with myopia less than -10.00 D tended to result in undercorrection; astigmatic correction in eyes with myopia over 10.25 D was minimal.
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) in correcting astigmatism of more than -2.00 diopters (D) in eyes with low, high, and extreme myopia. SETTING: Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea. METHODS: Eighty-five patients (110 eyes) whose spherical error ranged from -3.00 to -13.00 D and cylinder ranged from -2.00 to -5.50 D had PARK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser; follow-up was 6 months. All cases of myopic astigmatism were treated using the elliptical method and multizone ablation technique. Eyes were divided into 3 groups: low myopia, less than 6.00 D (n = 47); high myopia, from 6.25 to 10.00 D (n = 43); extreme myopia, over 10.25 D (n = 20). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate the astigmatic change. RESULTS: By vector analysis, the success rate of astigmatic correction was more predictable in the low and high myopia groups than in the extreme myopia group (P < .05). There was little improvement in astigmatism in the extreme myopia group. CONCLUSION: Using PARK to correct astigmatism greater than -2.00 D in eyes with myopia less than -10.00 D tended to result in undercorrection; astigmatic correction in eyes with myopia over 10.25 D was minimal.