BACKGROUND: The long intracellular half-life of gemcitabine's active metabolite, difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate (dFdCTP), suggested that small increases in peak intracellular dFdCTP levels would have a profound effect on its intracellular area under the curve (AUC). Previous studies had shown that a dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min that achieved plasma gemcitabine concentrations of 15-20 mumol/l maximized the intracellular rate of accumulation of dFdCTP. This phase I study was therefore designed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of this pharmacologically-based strategy; assessing the toxic effects and anticancer activity of high weekly doses of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty one patients with solid tumor malignancies received 103 courses of gemcitabine. Twenty nine patients had received prior treatment. Weekly doses were escalated from 1200 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 120 minutes to 2800 mg/m2 over 280 minutes for three weeks every four weeks. RESULTS: The first-course MTD was 2250 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression with thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia quantitatively more important than anemia. However, cumulative myelosuppression was documented suggesting that a lower MTD of 1800 mg/m2 was more appropriate with a recommended phase II starting dose of 1500 mg/m2. There was no neurologic toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal and included fatigue, nausea, and skin rash, but was not dose dependent. Three objective responses were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Escalated doses of gemcitabine designed to maximize intracellular dFdCTP levels can be safely administered using a fixed dose rate. The encouraging anticancer effects documented in patients with refractory malignancies suggests that short gemcitabine infusions based on well-established cellular pharmacologic principles may improve the therapeutic index of this agent. Comparison with standard 30-minute bolus dosing will be evaluated in subsequent randomized phase II trials.
BACKGROUND: The long intracellular half-life of gemcitabine's active metabolite, difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate (dFdCTP), suggested that small increases in peak intracellular dFdCTP levels would have a profound effect on its intracellular area under the curve (AUC). Previous studies had shown that a dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min that achieved plasma gemcitabine concentrations of 15-20 mumol/l maximized the intracellular rate of accumulation of dFdCTP. This phase I study was therefore designed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of this pharmacologically-based strategy; assessing the toxic effects and anticancer activity of high weekly doses of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty one patients with solid tumor malignancies received 103 courses of gemcitabine. Twenty nine patients had received prior treatment. Weekly doses were escalated from 1200 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 120 minutes to 2800 mg/m2 over 280 minutes for three weeks every four weeks. RESULTS: The first-course MTD was 2250 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression with thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia quantitatively more important than anemia. However, cumulative myelosuppression was documented suggesting that a lower MTD of 1800 mg/m2 was more appropriate with a recommended phase II starting dose of 1500 mg/m2. There was no neurologic toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal and included fatigue, nausea, and skin rash, but was not dose dependent. Three objective responses were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Escalated doses of gemcitabine designed to maximize intracellular dFdCTP levels can be safely administered using a fixed dose rate. The encouraging anticancer effects documented in patients with refractory malignancies suggests that short gemcitabine infusions based on well-established cellular pharmacologic principles may improve the therapeutic index of this agent. Comparison with standard 30-minute bolus dosing will be evaluated in subsequent randomized phase II trials.
Authors: R A Wolff; P Chiao; R Lenzi; P W Pisters; J E Lee; N A Janjan; C H Crane; D B Evans; J L Abbruzzese Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Wolfgang Fiebiger; Ulrike Olszewski; Ernst Ulsperger; Klaus Geissler; Gerhard Hamilton Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Basil F El-Rayes; Mark M Zalupski; Anthony F Shields; Ann Marie Ferris; Ulka Vaishampayan; Lance K Heilbrun; Raghu Venkatramanamoorthy; Volkan Adsay; Philip A Philip Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Peter Schmid; Marcus Schweigert; Thomas Beinert; Bernd Flath; Orhan Sezer; Kurt Possinger Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Peter D Cole; Cindy L Schwartz; Richard A Drachtman; Pedro A de Alarcon; Lu Chen; Tanya M Trippett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Z Guan; Y Wang; S Maoleekoonpairoj; Z Chen; W S Kim; V Ratanatharathorn; W H H Reece; T W Kim; M Lehnert Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 7.640