Literature DB >> 9817772

Assessments of Wetland Functions: What They Are and What They Are Not.

.   

Abstract

/ Many methods have been developed over the last two decades to provide information about wetland functions, but there has been little discussion of the models and algorithms used. Methods for generating information about wetlands were analyzed to understand their similarities, differences, and the type of information provided. Methods can first be grouped by the type of information they provide-classifications, characterizations, ratings, assessments, and evaluations. Methods that characterize, rate, or assess wetlands may generate information using one of two conceptual approaches-logic and mechanistic. Most methods that generate a numeric assessment of performance or value of wetland functions rely on the mechanistic approach to constructing models. Rapid assessment methods based on mechanistic models, however, do not assess the rates or dynamics of ecological processes occurring in wetlands. Rather, they provide a clear and concise way of organizing our current, and often subjective, knowledge about wetland functions. This is one limitation of current methods that is often misunderstood both by wetland managers and the scientific community. The advantages and limitations of the assumptions and the computational elements inherent in these approaches are discussed to provide wetland managers and regulators a better understanding of the information they are using. KEY WORDS: Wetlands; Functions; Assessment; Models; Methods

Year:  1999        PMID: 9817772     DOI: 10.1007/s002679900168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  Principles for the monitoring and evaluation of wetland extent, condition and function in Australia.

Authors:  Neil Saintilan; Sarah Imgraben
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Remote sensing and GIS techniques for selecting a sustainable scenario for Lake Koronia, Greece.

Authors:  Thomas K Alexandridis; Vasileios Takavakoglou; Thomas L Crisman; George C Zalidis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Developing rapid methods for analyzing upland riparian functions and values.

Authors:  Thomas Hruby
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Rapid assessment of urban wetlands: do hydrogeomorphic classification and reference criteria work?

Authors:  Emilie K Stander; Joan G Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Assessing natural and anthropogenic variability in wetland structure for two hydrogeomorphic riverine wetland subclasses.

Authors:  Daniel Dvorett; Joseph Bidwell; Craig Davis; Chris DuBois
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Re-establishing a sustainable wetland at former Lake Karla, Greece, using Ramsar restoration guidelines.

Authors:  George C Zalidis; Vasilios Takavakoglou; Athanasios Panoras; George Bilas; Sotiria Katsavouni
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Catchment-wide wetland assessment and prioritization using the multi-criteria decision-making method TOPSIS.

Authors:  Canran Liu; Paul Frazier; Lalit Kumar; Catherine Macgregor; Nigel Blake
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.644

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.