Literature DB >> 9817399

Minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy: technique and results.

F F Marshall1, D Chan, A W Partin, R Gurganus, S C Hortopan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A small incision (minilaparotomy) radical retropubic prostatectomy is described and evaluated. A newly designed self-retaining retractor was used as a robot and functioned as a second operative assistant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 522 consecutive patients underwent minilaparotomy radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon (F. F. M.) between 1991 and 1997. The technique of minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy (a 7 to 8 cm. midline incision) is described in detail.
RESULTS: A questionnaire was mailed to all 522 patients and there were 265 responses. Satisfactory continence was achieved in the short term in 85% of patients (0 to 1 pad). Of the patients 83% had a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng./ml. at average followup of 2.6 years. There was no operative mortality and the overall complication rates were similar to other patients treated by the same department staff with a larger incision. The typical patient was discharged home 3 days postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy compares favorably with standard radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9817399     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199812020-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  New techniques and management options for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joycelyn L Speight; Mack Roach
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

2.  Prospective randomized comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic outcome associated with mini-transverse and mini-longitudinal radical prostatectomy incisions.

Authors:  Bruce R Kava; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Cynthia T Soloway; Miguel Suarez; Prashanth Kanagarajah; Manoharan Murugesan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

3.  Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes in a Single Regional Center.

Authors:  Lorenzo Giuseppe Luciani; Daniele Mattevi; William Mantovani; Tommaso Cai; Stefano Chiodini; Valentino Vattovani; Marco Puglisi; Daniele Tiscione; Umberto Anceschi; Gianni Malossini
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  Impact of cosmetic result on selection of surgical treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  María Alejandra Egui Rojo; Juan Ignacio Martinez-Salamanca; Mario Alvarez Maestro; Ignacio Sola Galarza; Joaquin Carballido Rodriguez
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.