Literature DB >> 9816287

Determination of angiogenesis adds information to estrogen receptor status in predicting the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen in node-positive breast cancer patients.

G Gasparini1, S B Fox, P Verderio, E Bonoldi, P Bevilacqua, P Boracchi, S Dante, E Marubini, A L Harris.   

Abstract

There is experimental and clinical evidence that angiogenesis is involved in breast cancer progression and metastasis. To investigate whether the determination of angiogenesis adds prognostic information to the estrogen receptor (ER) status, we studied a series of 178 node-positive breast cancer patients, with a median follow-up time exceeding 5 years, treated with adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM). We assessed angiogenesis by the quantification of the intratumoral microvessel density and the determination of the Chalkley score using light microscopy. Microvessels were immunostained using the anti-CD31 antibody. The other features studied were ER status and the conventional clinicopathological prognostic indicators. Results were pooled from two collaborating Centers using Chalkley counts to convert intratumoral microvessel density to a common quantification system. We found that Chalkley score was not associated with any other feature studied. In univariate analysis, Chalkley score was significantly predictive of both relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS; P < 0. 00001 and P = 0.00004, respectively). Likewise, ER status, the number of metastatic axillary nodes, histological grading, and tumor size were significantly predictive for RFS and OS. Cox multivariate analysis showed that Chalkley score was the strongest significant independent predictor of outcome. For RFS, ER status, the number of metastatic nodes, and histological grading also retained significance. For OS, the number of metastatic nodes, tumor size, and histological grading were independent prognostic factors. The joint assessment of the above variables had a satisfactory prognostic capability, as found using the Harrel statistics (c = 0. 77). These results suggest the validity of using Chalkley counts to assess and compare angiogenesis for prognostic purposes between different Centers. We found that angiogenesis adds significant prognostic information to ER status in predicting the outcome of breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant TAM. In fact, irrespective of the ER status, the patients with highly angiogenic tumors had a poor outcome, even if treated with TAM. For these patients, the inhibition of angiogenesis with specific angioinhibitory drugs may be a promising new therapeutic strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9816287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  9 in total

Review 1.  Angiogenesis as a target for breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  D Rayson; S A Vantyghem; A F Chambers
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Angiogenesis: possibilities for therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  W Wynendaele; A T van Oosterom; A Pawinski; E A de Bruijn; R A Maes
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1998-12

3.  Behaviour of metastasis in relation to vascular index in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

Authors:  G Gasparini; M Fanelli; P Boracchi; A Morabito; N Locopo; E Biganzoli
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 4.  Molecular markers for predicting response to tamoxifen in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D R Ciocca; R Elledge
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.925

5.  Breast Tumor Angiogenesis and Tumor-Associated Macrophages: Histopathologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Ewe Seng Ch'ng; Hasnan Jaafar; Sharifah Emilia Tuan Sharif
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-06-15

6.  Does vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) predict local relapse and survival in radiotherapy-treated node-negative breast cancer?

Authors:  B Linderholm; B Tavelin; K Grankvist; R Henriksson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Intra-tumoural microvessel density in human solid tumours.

Authors:  J Hasan; R Byers; G C Jayson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Breast tumour angiogenesis.

Authors:  Stephen B Fox; Daniele G Generali; Adrian L Harris
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Tumour microvessel density as predictor of chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  O Tynninen; J Sjöström; K von Boguslawski; N O Bengtsson; R Heikkilä; P Malmström; B Ostenstad; E Wist; V Valvere; E Saksela; T Paavonen; C Blomqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.