Literature DB >> 9815043

Characterization and mechanisms of the pharyngoesophageal inhibitory reflex.

I M Lang1, B K Medda, J Ren, R Shaker.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to identify and to characterize the pharyngoesophageal inhibitory reflex (PEIR) in an animal model. Thirty-one cats (2.4-5.0 kg) were anesthetized using alpha-chloralose (45 mg/kg ip), and esophageal peristalsis was recorded manometrically. Secondary peristalsis was activated by rapid air injection (8-20 ml) at midesophagus or slow infusion of water through the manometric catheters. Neither stimulus activated primary peristalsis. The PEIR was activated by rapid water injection or focal mechanical stimulation of the pharynx. Rapid air injection activated secondary peristalsis in 92% of the trials, and slow water infusion activated 1 secondary peristalsis every 3.2 min. Pharyngeal stimulation by 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, or 1.0 ml of water inhibited or blocked ongoing secondary peristalsis in 67, 82, 97, or 93% of trials, respectively. Mechanical stimulation of the posterior wall of the pharynx with 11-20 g pressure attenuated secondary peristalsis in 96% of the trials or blocked secondary peristalsis in 41% of the trials. Centripetal electrical stimulation at 30 Hz, 0.2 ms, 2 V for 4 s of the superior laryngeal (SLN) or glossopharyngeal (GPN) nerves blocked or inhibited secondary peristalsis in 100% of the trials. Bilateral transection of the GPN (n = 8), but not the SLN (n = 6), blocked the PEIR. Anesthetization of the pharyngeal mucosa using lidocaine (2%) blocked the PEIR (n = 3). We concluded that 1) the PEIR exists in the cat, 2) mechanical stimulation of the pharynx more strongly activates the PEIR than water, 3) activation of either SLN or GPN afferents attenuates ongoing secondary peristalsis, 4) the receptors mediating the PEIR are located in the pharyngeal mucosa, and 5) both SLN and GPN contribute to the PEIR, but the GPN is the major afferent limb of this reflex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9815043     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1998.275.5.G1127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  6 in total

1.  Differential activation of medullary vagal nuclei caused by stimulation of different esophageal mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang; Bidyut K Medda; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Electrophysiological characterization of vagal afferents relevant to mucosal nociception in the rat upper oesophagus.

Authors:  J K M Lennerz; C Dentsch; N Bernardini; T Hummel; W L Neuhuber; P W Reeh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Brain stem control of the phases of swallowing.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Role of peripheral reflexes in the initiation of the esophageal phase of swallowing.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang; Bidyut K Medda; Arash Babaei; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Differential activation of pontomedullary nuclei by acid perfusion of different regions of the esophagus.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang; Bidyut K Medda; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Physiological and pathological roles of the accommodation response in lower esophageal sphincter relaxation during wet swallows.

Authors:  Kazumasa Muta; Eikichi Ihara; Shohei Hamada; Hiroko Ikeda; Masafumi Wada; Yoshitaka Hata; Xiaopeng Bai; Yuichiro Nishihara; Yoshimasa Tanaka; Haruei Ogino; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.