Literature DB >> 9814808

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without sternotomy. Experience with the first 50 cases.

C Minale1, H J Reifschneider, E Schmitz, F P Uckmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The method of replacing the aortic valve via a mini-thoracotomy has been reported in the recent literature. Although this strategy has clear advantages, further refinements of the process make the procedure even less invasive.
METHODS: Aortic valve replacement was performed in 50 patients whose age ranged between 49 and 82 years, averaging 68+/-8.3 years. As access route, a right parasternal mini-thoracotomy of about 8 cm, without rib resection was used. Cardiopulmonary bypass was connected through the same access. Standard surgical techniques and equipment were employed. In all patients a mechanical prosthesis was implanted.
RESULTS: There were neither intraoperative complications nor hospital death. All patients could be discharged home at an average of 10+/-3 days postoperatively. Cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, total operation time averaged 118+/-32, 70+/-21, 180+/-45 min, respectively. Four patients could be extubated in the operative theater, the others on the intensive care units at an average of 12+/-6 h, postoperatively. One patient with a very thin aortic wall sustained a severe bleeding from the aortic cannulation site during an hypertensive crisis, just after extubation. He had to be re-entered immediately via a median sternotomy. A second patient, who was initially operated on because of a floride aortitis, had a limited periprosthetic leak 2 months postoperatively. The leak was repaired via a median sternotomy. Drainage lost and blood substitution averaged 751+/-400 and 274+/-390, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of the present method include further reduction of hospital trauma, preservation of chest wall integrity, early mobilization and rehabilitation of the patient. Surgical technical improvements include avoidance of groin cannulation, simpler equipment, and an easy access in case of reoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9814808     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00120-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is minimally invasive heart valve surgery a paradigm for the future?

Authors:  A M Gillinov; M K Banbury; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery of mitral valve (MIS-MV).

Authors:  Mikihiko Kudo; Ryohei Yozu
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-11

3.  Minimal access aortic root, valve, and complex ascending aortic surgery.

Authors:  J G Byrne; A N Karavas; L H Cohn; D H Adams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Evaluation of Aortic Valve Replacement via the Right Parasternal Approach without Rib Removal.

Authors:  Akimasa Morisaki; Koji Hattori; Yasuyuki Kato; Manabu Motoki; Yosuke Takahashi; Shinsuke Nishimura; Toshihiko Shibata
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.520

5.  Double venous drainage through the superior vena cava in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tomislav Klokocovnik; Tanja Kersnik Levart; Matjaz Bunc
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Comparing Aortic Valve Replacement through Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy with Median Sternotomy.

Authors:  Abdul Gani Ahangar; Aakib Hamid Charag; Mohd Lateef Wani; Farooq Ahmad Ganie; Shyam Singh; Syed Asrar Ahmad Qadri; Zameer Ahmad Shah
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2013-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.