Literature DB >> 9814522

Low-dose phase contrast x-ray medical imaging.

F Arfelli1, M Assante, V Bonvicini, A Bravin, G Cantatore, E Castelli, L Dalla Palma, M Di Michiel, R Longo, A Olivo, S Pani, D Pontoni, P Poropat, M Prest, A Rashevsky, G Tromba, A Vacchi, E Vallazza, F Zanconati.   

Abstract

Phase contrast x-ray imaging is a powerful technique for the detection of low-contrast details in weakly absorbing objects. This method is of possible relevance in the field of diagnostic radiology. In fact, imaging low-contrast details within soft tissue does not give satisfactory results in conventional x-ray absorption radiology, mammography being a typical example. Nevertheless, up to now all applications of the phase contrast technique, carried out on thin samples, have required radiation doses substantially higher than those delivered in conventional radiological examinations. To demonstrate the applicability of the method to mammography we produced phase contrast images of objects a few centimetres thick while delivering radiation doses lower than or comparable to doses needed in standard mammographic examinations (typically approximately 1 mGy mean glandular dose (MGD)). We show images of a custom mammographic phantom and of two specimens of human breast tissue obtained at the SYRMEP bending magnet beamline at Elettra, the Trieste synchrotron radiation facility. The introduction of an intensifier screen enabled us to obtain phase contrast images of these thick samples with radiation doses comparable to those used in mammography. Low absorbing details such as 50 microm thick nylon wires or thin calcium deposits (approximately 50 microm) within breast tissue, invisible with conventional techniques, are detected by means of the proposed method. We also find that the use of a bending magnet radiation source relaxes the previously reported requirements on source size for phase contrast imaging. Finally, the consistency of the results has been checked by theoretical simulations carried out for the purposes of this experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9814522     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/10/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  39 in total

Review 1.  Synchrotron radiation in radiology: novel X-ray sources.

Authors:  G Margaritondo; R Meuli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Synchrotron radiation in radiology: radiology techniques based on synchrotron sources.

Authors:  Reto Meuli; Yeukuang Hwu; Jung Ho Je; Giorgio Margaritondo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  First application of computed radiology to mammography with synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  E Quai; R Longo; F Zanconati; G Jaconelli; M Tonutti; A Abrami; F Arfelli; D Dreossi; G Tromba; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Analytical reconstructions of intensity modulated x-ray phase-contrast imaging of human scale phantoms.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Włodarczyk; Jakub Pietrzak
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Boundary-enhanced region-of-interest image reconstruction in propagation-based x-ray phase-contrast tomography.

Authors:  Mark A Anastasio; Daxin Shi; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Potential for imaging engineered tissues with X-ray phase contrast.

Authors:  Alyssa Appel; Mark A Anastasio; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  Objective measurements of image quality in synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging versus digital mammography.

Authors:  Y Ruiz-Gonzalez; M Perez-Diaz; D Martínez-Aguila; M Diaz-Barreto; I Fleitas; R Mora-Machado; L Rigon; G Tromba; P Bregant
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach.

Authors:  Erik Fredenberg; Mats Danielsson; J Webster Stayman; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Magnus Aslund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Phantom-based comparison of conventional versus phase-contrast mammography for LCD soft-copy diagnosis.

Authors:  Akiko Ihori; Naotoshi Fujita; Akihiro Sugiura; Naruomi Yasuda; Yoshie Kodera
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Noise and analyzer-crystal angular position analysis for analyzer-based phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Keivan Majidi; Jun Li; Carol Muehleman; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.