Literature DB >> 9813738

[Current pharmaco-therapeutic strategies in the treatment of arterial hypertension].

M Beaufils1, D L Clément.   

Abstract

The aim of the treatment of hypertensive disease is to reduce its associated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Simply reducing blood pressure levels is clearly not adequate since its impact on coronary heart disease is particularly unsatisfactory. Moreover, the beneficial effects of antihypertensive treatment seem to plateau for several years, and the incidence of cardiac and renal failure is even increasing. Therefore, recommendations by groups of national or international experts are periodically updated on the basis of current epidemiological data. Two such recommendations appeared in 1997, one from the Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES) in France and the other from the Joint National Committee (JNC) on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, in the United States. Both advocate the use of lifestyle modifications in all patients. The threshold blood pressure level at which pharmacological therapy is introduced largely depends on associated cardiovascular risk factors and/or involvement of target organs. The JNC recommends a particularly low threshold in patients with diabetes. Pharmacological treatment is usually initiated with a single drug. The choice of any one drug depends on the patient profile and takes into consideration such characteristics as age and associated risk factors or comorbidity. Some represent a contraindication for certain therapeutic classes (for example, asthma for beta-blockers, renovascular hypertension for ACE inhibitors), while others are a specific or even 'compelling' indication (heart failure, angina, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease etc.). This patient profiling is very precisely described in the new recommendations. However, any such single drug therapy provides adequate blood pressure control in no more than about 50 to 60% of patients. When the patient does not respond to the drug used or experiences side effects, substitution of a drug from another pharmacological class is recommended. In contrast, if the patient is a responder but blood pressure remains above the target level, it is preferable to add a second drug from a class offering complementary action. The use of a combination therapy allows blood pressure control in more than 80% of patients. More authors are suggesting that combination therapy as first-line treatment may increase the number of responders and reduce the impact of counter-regulatory effects occurring with single drug therapy (e.g. sodium retention, or sympathetic activation). This alternative strategy is now acknowledged in the recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9813738     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199856002-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  26 in total

1.  The case for low dose diuretic therapy.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of the choice of components of combination therapy.

Authors:  J L Reid
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 3.  The absolute risk as a guide to influence the treatment decision-making process in mild hypertension.

Authors:  G Chatellier; J Ménard
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Fagard; L Thijs; H Celis; G G Arabidze; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; P W de Leeuw; C T Dollery; A E Fletcher; F Forette; G Leonetti; C Nachev; E T O'Brien; J Rosenfeld; J L Rodicio; J Tuomilehto; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Antihypertensive effects of calcium antagonists. Clinical facts and modulating factors.

Authors:  D L Clement; M De Buyzere; D Duprez
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-11-24

7.  Office versus ambulatory recordings of blood pressure (OvA): a European multicenter study. The Steering Committee.

Authors:  D L Clement
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1990-12

Review 8.  Treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  A F Lever; L E Ramsay
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. Collaborative Group on ACE Inhibitor Trials.

Authors:  R Garg; S Yusuf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Randomised controlled trial of enalapril and beta blockers in non-diabetic chronic renal failure.

Authors:  T Hannedouche; P Landais; B Goldfarb; N el Esper; A Fournier; M Godin; D Durand; J Chanard; F Mignon; J M Suo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.