Literature DB >> 9812254

Assessment of rehabilitation needs in cancer patients.

W H van Harten1, O van Noort, R Warmerdam, H Hendricks, E Seidel.   

Abstract

In Germany and the United States cancer patients are admitted to rehabilitation programmes after anti-cancer treatment. Such programmes do not exist in the Netherlands. This leads to the question of whether in the Dutch health care situation certain problems (impairments-disabilities-handicaps) exist in (ex)cancer patients that can be dealt with by a rehabilitation programme. Using theories on the development of health care needs of chronic patients and the WHO approach of Impairment, Disability and Handicap, a framework for a questionnaire was developed. This questionnaire used quality of life items, functional health items and items mainly from specific cancer-orientated instruments. One hundred and forty seven patients participated in the study. After the results of this phase were clear, a focus group approach combined with in-depth interviews was used to present patients with possible rehabilitation programmes. Questions were formulated verifying the nature of prior results, inquiring about specific elements and desired outcomes and about practical aspects concerning post-cancer rehabilitation. The population consisted mostly of breast cancer (69.4%) and bowel cancer patients (23.8%). Quality of life scored averagely moderate, not indicating large problems. About 26% of all respondents wanted to receive professional help; this was largely determined by perceived quality of life and level of social support. The desire for professional help concentrated significantly on role performance, cognition, control, family relations, psychologic and somatic aspects. The focus group discussion and interviews revealed that patients would prefer a rehabilitation programme focusing on reducing fatigue, reinforcing loadability, coping with social aspects, dietary aspects and finding new life targets. Quality of life seemed to be relatively high and only 26% of post-cancer patients indicated the need of rehabilitation. Related to a significantly lower quality of life score, improved physical loadability and psychosocial functioning (coping) should be the main outcomes of such a programme. Specific elements such as dietary advice and finding new life targets should, from the patients' perspective, be included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9812254     DOI: 10.1097/00004356-199809000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res        ISSN: 0342-5282            Impact factor:   1.479


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of unmet needs and correlated factors in advanced-stage cancer patients receiving rehabilitation.

Authors:  Takaaki Hasegawa; Naoya Goto; Naoto Matsumoto; Yusuke Sasaki; Takashi Ishiguro; Nanori Kuzuya; Yasuyuki Sugiyama
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study "The Cancer Patient's World".

Authors:  Lone Ross; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Anna Thit Johnsen; Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Attachment style and respiratory sinus arrhythmia predict post-treatment quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Christopher P Fagundes; Lisa M Jaremka; William B Malarkey; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lise Vilstrup Holm; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Christoffer Johansen; Peter Vedsted; Pia Veldt Larsen; Jakob Kragstrup; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Web-based self-management for young cancer survivors: consideration of user requirements and barriers to implementation.

Authors:  Louise Moody; Andrew Turner; Jane Osmond; Louise Hooker; Joanna Kosmala-Anderson; Lynn Batehup
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 6.  Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies.

Authors:  J L Hoving; M L A Broekhuizen; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.