Literature DB >> 9811553

The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: a PET study.

S F Cappa1, D Perani, T Schnur, M Tettamanti, F Fazio.   

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies of patients with category-specific recognition disorders, as well as PET investigations of semantic category effects in visual recognition tasks, have led some authors to the hypothesis that visual-perceptual knowledge plays a crucial role in the recognition of natural items, such as animals, while functional-associative information is more important for the recognition of man-made tools. To study the cerebral correlates of the retrieval of different types of semantic knowledge about living and nonliving entities, we performed a PET experiment in which normal subjects were required to access visual- and functional-associative information related to visually presented words corresponding to animals and tools. The experimental conditions were the following: (1) Rest. (2) Baseline: letter detection in pseudo-words. (3) Animal, visual knowledge: decide whether the animal has a long or short tail with respect to the body. (4) Animal, associative knowledge: decide whether the animal is typically found in Italy. (5) Tool, visual knowledge: decide whether the object is longer than wider or vice versa. (6) Tool, functional knowledge: decide whether the object is typically used as a kitchen tool. Lexical-semantic access (all lexical conditions pooled) activated the prefrontal cortex on the left and the parietal-occipital junction and posterior cingulate cortex bilaterally. An analysis of the individual experimental conditions in comparison with the nonword baseline showed that accessing visual versus associative knowledge was associated with different activation patterns: predominantly frontal in the case of visual features, temporoparietal for associative knowledge. While the activation patterns involved similar areas for living and nonliving entities, in the case of the latter they were restricted to the left hemisphere. The analysis of main effects confirmed these findings: there were several significant differences in the visual-associative comparison, while category-related differences were less prominent. These findings indicate that the retrieval of different types of knowledge is associated with distinct patterns of brain activation; on the other hand, category-related differences were less evident than in picture matching and naming tasks. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811553     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  25 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Grèzes; J Decety
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Category differences in brain activation studies: where do they come from?

Authors:  M L Gorno-Tempini; L Cipolotti; C J Price
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Neural representation of verb meaning: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Murray Grossman; Phyllis Koenig; Chris DeVita; Guila Glosser; David Alsop; John Detre; James Gee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Large, colorful, or noisy? Attribute- and modality-specific activations during retrieval of perceptual attribute knowledge.

Authors:  M L Kellenbach; M Brett; K Patterson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: a critical review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J E Joseph
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Right hemispheric participation in semantic decision improves performance.

Authors:  Kiely M Donnelly; Jane B Allendorfer; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Semantic memory.

Authors:  Daniel Saumier; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Brain activation during semantic judgment of Chinese sentences: A functional MRI study.

Authors:  Lei Mo; Ho-Ling Liu; Hua Jin; Ya-Ling Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Phonological decoding involves left posterior fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  Nicole A E Dietz; Karen M Jones; Lynn Gareau; Thomas A Zeffiro; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  How necessary are the stripes of a tiger? Diagnostic and characteristic features in an fMRI study of word meaning.

Authors:  Murray Grossman; Vanessa Troiani; Phyllis Koenig; Melissa Work; Peachie Moore
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.