Literature DB >> 9811024

Safety considerations and fluid resuscitation in liposuction: an analysis of 53 consecutive patients.

S A Trott1, S J Beran, R J Rohrich, J M Kenkel, W P Adams, K W Klein.   

Abstract

There is no agreement as to appropriate fluid resuscitation in patients undergoing liposuction. This has assumed greater significance, as surgeons have undertaken larger volume aspirations (> or = 4 liters) and the potential complications of hypovolemia and fluid overload have materialized. This prospective study of 53 consecutive healthy patients undergoing liposuction using a superwet technique served to develop general guidelines for safe perioperative fluid management, especially in regard to large-volume aspirations. In this context, "aspirate" is defined as the total fat and fluid that is removed during liposuction. All patients were monitored using standard noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. Thirty-six patients were monitored perioperatively with Foley catheters. The 53 patients underwent liposuction alone. We did not include patients who underwent concurrent aesthetic surgical procedures because our intention was to establish fluid administration guidelines for the liposuction patient. There were no significant complications in our series. The intraoperative fluid ratio, defined as (intravenous fluid + infiltrate)/aspirate, was 2.1 for the small-volume group and 1.4 for the large-volume group. These values were significantly different (p < .001, t test). Average urine output in the operating room and recovery room and on the floor was satisfactory (> 0.5 to 1 cc/kg/hr) and did not relate to volume aspirated (p = 0.21, 0.91, and 0.6, respectively, t test). Four patients who underwent "large-volume" aspirations (> or = 4 liters) had transient hypotension, which was immediately responsive to crystalloid fluid boluses in the first postoperative hours. All other patients required only maintenance intravenous crystalloid postoperatively until oral intake had been resumed. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative fluid administration between the small- and large-volume groups. Ninety-three percent of patients were discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Our suggested guidelines for fluid resuscitation based on this retrospective study are as follows: (1) small volume (< 4 liters aspirated): maintenance fluid + subcutaneous wetting solution; (2) large volume (> or = 4 liters aspirated): maintenance fluid + subcutaneous wetting solution + 0.25 cc of intravenous crystalloid per cc of aspirate removed after 4 liters. This formula has since been used in the care of 94 patients who have undergone liposuction exclusively. All patients have had unremarkable hospital courses. These guidelines do not replace sound clinical judgment. Good communication between the surgeon and anesthesiologist is critical to optimal patient care and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811024     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  13 in total

1.  Acute pulmonary edema following liposuction due to heart failure and atypical pneumonia.

Authors:  Uwe Wollina; Andreas Graf; Volkmar Hanisch
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-01-21

2.  Liposuction infiltration: The Quito formula - a new approach based on an old concept.

Authors:  Iván Marcelo Cueva Galárraga
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

3.  Perioperative considerations for patient safety during cosmetic surgery - preventing complications.

Authors:  Warren A Ellsworth; C Bob Basu; Ronald E Iverson
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2009

4.  Safe limits for aspirate volume under wet liposuction.

Authors:  João Cantarelli; Moacir F Godoy
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Liposuction: Anaesthesia challenges.

Authors:  Jayashree Sood; Lakshmi Jayaraman; Nitin Sethi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-05

Review 6.  Avoiding unfavourable outcomes in liposuction.

Authors:  Atul Khanna; George Filobbos
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05

7.  Electrolyte and Haemogram changes post large volume liposuction comparing two different tumescent solutions.

Authors:  Kumar Vivek; Shah Amiti; Saha Shivshankar; Choudhary Lalit
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

8.  Safety and benefits of large-volume liposuction: a single center experience.

Authors:  Youssef Saleh; Mahmoud El-Oteify; Abd-El-Radi Abd-El-Salam; Ahmed Tohamy; Alaa A Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-02-02

9.  Current trends of liposuction in India: Survey and Analysis.

Authors:  Bijoy Methil
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

10.  Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction.

Authors:  Giovanni Ferrando
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.