Literature DB >> 9811000

Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: Part I. Histologic and radiographic analysis.

N M Rowe1, B J Mehrara, M E Dudziak, D S Steinbreck, R J Mackool, G K Gittes, J G McCarthy, M T Longaker.   

Abstract

The application of distraction osteogenesis to craniofacial surgery has altered the approach and treatment of congenital and acquired craniofacial defects. Although the histologic and ultrastructural changes associated with distraction osteogenesis have been described extensively, relatively little is known about the molecular regulation of this process. The elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis has important clinical implications because it may facilitate the use of recombinant proteins or gene therapy to accelerate bone regeneration. Molecular analysis of distraction osteogenesis has been hindered by the use of large animal models in which only limited genetic information is available. In this study, a rat model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis is described. This report includes a pilot study (n = 50) to develop an appropriate distraction device and to determine the optimal placement of the osteotomy. The study subsequently included 80 animals, 35 of which were distracted at a rate of 0.25 mm per day for 6 days (1.5 mm total) and 35 that were distracted at a rate of 0.25 mm twice per day (3.0 mm total). These animals were killed at various time points (after latency and during the distraction and consolidation periods) and displayed histologic and radiographic findings of membranous bone distraction osteogenesis that were consistent with those in large ,animal and clinical models. In addition, five animals each were acutely lengthened 1.5 mm and 3.0 mm and demonstrated a fibrous nonunion. Furthermore, the utility of this model is demonstrated in the analysis of the molecular mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis by applying the polymerase chain reaction to total cellular RNA isolated from normal and distracted rat mandibles. In conclusion, it is believed that the rat model of distraction osteogenesis has significant advantages over traditional models, including decreased costs and facilitation of molecular analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811000     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  In vivo modulation of FGF biological activity alters cranial suture fate.

Authors:  J A Greenwald; B J Mehrara; J A Spector; S M Warren; P J Fagenholz; L E Smith; P J Bouletreau; F E Crisera; H Ueno; M T Longaker
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Radiomorphometric quantitative analysis of vasculature utilizing micro-computed tomography and vessel perfusion in the murine mandible.

Authors:  Xi Lin Jing; Aaron S Farberg; Laura A Monson; Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-10-22

3.  Regenerate healing outcomes in unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using quantitative histomorphometry.

Authors:  Daniel A Schwarz; Krikor G Arman; Mehreen S Kakwan; Ameen M Jamali; Ayman A Elmeligy; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Role of parathyroid hormone therapy in reversing radiation-induced nonunion and normalization of radiomorphometrics in a murine mandibular model of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  K Kelly Gallagher; Sagar Deshpande; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Alexis Donneys; Deniz Sarhaddi; Noah S Nelson; Douglas B Chepeha; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Parathyroid hormone reverses radiation induced hypovascularity in a murine model of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Sagar S Deshpande; Alexis Donneys; Jose J Rodriguez; Noah S Nelson; Peter A Felice; Douglas B Chepeha; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Katayoun Hatefi; Francis Le Roux; Javad Alizargar; Zeinolabedin Behdadipour; Yimesker Yihun; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.