Literature DB >> 9810983

Variability of the midfacial muscles: analysis of 50 hemifacial cadaver dissections.

J E Pessa1, V P Zadoo, E K Adrian, C H Yuan, J Aydelotte, J R Garza.   

Abstract

The region of the midface represents a challenging area to both reconstructive and aesthetic surgeons. An anatomic study was performed that attempted to identify patterns and variations of the muscular anatomy. The goals of this study were twofold: to identify patterns and variability of the midfacial muscles that might impact on reconstructive efforts and to attempt to correlate this anatomy with features of the overlying soft tissues, specifically the nasolabial crease. Fifty hemifacial cadaver dissections were performed. The information collected was assembled into a large data base, and statistical significance was analyzed using Fisher's exact probability test. Results demonstrated that, although a great degree of variability exists with respect to the midfacial muscles, seven distinct patterns of these muscles did emerge. The most common pattern was the presence of a levator alae nasi, levator labii superioris, and zygomaticus major, which occurred in 44 percent of specimens. Specimens that possessed a risorius, zygomaticus minor, or both, were relatively uncommon. The consistent presence of the levators suggests adding a superior vector to recreate a smile in facial reanimation surgery. Two important anatomic variations were noted. A bifid zygomaticus major was found to be present in 34 percent of individuals. Because the inferior bundle had a dermocutaneous insertion, this anomaly may represent the anatomic correlate of a cheek "dimple." A second anomaly noted was the lateral cheek crease, which appeared to be associated with a cutaneous attachment from the underlying platysma muscle. However, no correlation could be found for facial muscle pattern and the overlying nasolabial crease structure. This lack of correlation may indicate that the facial muscles alone do not dictate the structure of the nasolabial crease and that other dynamic factors are involved in determining this feature of the aging face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9810983     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

Review 1.  Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?

Authors:  Caroline Wilkinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Nasolabial fold discontinuity during speech as a possible extended cleft phenotype.

Authors:  Karen L Schmidt; Katherine Neiswanger; Ellen Cohn; Rebecca Desensi; Carla Brandon; Kathleen Bardi; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2012-01-24

3.  A Cross-species Comparison of Facial Morphology and Movement in Humans and Chimpanzees Using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS).

Authors:  Sarah-Jane Vick; Bridget M Waller; Lisa A Parr; Marcia C Smith Pasqualini; Kim A Bard
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2007-03

4.  Anatomic landmarks of the buccal branches of the facial nerve.

Authors:  Canan Saylam; Hulya Ucerler; Mustafa Orhan; Cuneyt Ozek
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Topographic relationship between the muscle bands of the zygomaticus major muscle and the facial artery.

Authors:  Hyun-Ho Kwak; Kyung-Seok Hu; Kwan-Hyun Youn; Guang-Chun Jin; Kyoung-Sub Shim; Christian Fontaine; Hee-Jin Kim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Facial musculature in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta): evolutionary and functional contexts with comparisons to chimpanzees and humans.

Authors:  Anne M Burrows; Bridget M Waller; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Intramuscular electrical stimulation of facial muscles in humans and chimpanzees: Duchenne revisited and extended.

Authors:  Bridget M Waller; Sarah-Jane Vick; Lisa A Parr; Kim A Bard; Marcia C Smith Pasqualini; Katalin M Gothard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-08

Review 8.  Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression research.

Authors:  K L Schmidt; J F Cohn
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Three-dimensional appearance of the lips muscles with three-dimensional isotropic MRI: in vivo study.

Authors:  Raphael Olszewski; Y Liu; T Duprez; T M Xu; H Reychler
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.924

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.