Literature DB >> 9809272

Shopping in the healthcare information systems market--a search for well-camouflaged land mines.

R R Grams1.   

Abstract

The selection of a healthcare information system is analogous to a big game hunt. The buyers perceive themselves as the hunters while the truth is just the opposite. To strip away the carefully crafted facade of corporate marketing is an art form and requires due diligence on the part of the shopper. Suggestions are offered to the consumer on how to pierce the shell of corporate silence and find the facts that will make a significant difference in product selection. The objectives on the seller's side are to make as much profit as possible and give as little as required to make the sale. The buyer is looking for the best product, the best company, and the most painless installation. The ground between these two vastly different goals is the battlefield of healthcare computer procurement. May the best shopper win! Caveat emptor.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9809272     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020526010686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  4 in total

1.  Partners in risk. Who pays when your systems don't?

Authors:  P Schneider
Journal:  Healthc Inform       Date:  1998-02

2.  Validation of the laboratory information system.

Authors:  D F Cowan; R Z Gray; B Campbell
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Usability testing in medical informatics: cognitive approaches to evaluation of information systems and user interfaces.

Authors:  A W Kushniruk; V L Patel; J J Cimino
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

4.  Evaluating large scale health information systems: from practice towards theory.

Authors:  H A Heathfield; V Peel; P Hudson; S Kay; L Mackay; T Marley; L Nicholson; R Roberts; J Williams
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.