Literature DB >> 9809180

Open versus arthroscopic decompression for subacromial impingement. A comprehensive review of the literature from the last 25 years.

A J Checroun1, M G Dennis, J D Zuckerman.   

Abstract

The operative management (open versus arthroscopic) of subacromial impingement was investigated through a search of the English-language literature from 1970 to 1996. Thirty-four clinical studies comprising 1,935 patients met the following selection criteria: a study published in a peer reviewed journal, a valid materials and methods section (describing age, gender, number of subjects, follow-up period, treatment modality, and impingement stage), and acromioplasty without rotator cuff repair. Six hundred and ninety-eight patients had an open decompression (OD) and 1,237 had an arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) for Stage II and III impingement. When possible, only Stage II patients were reviewed. A few studies combined Stage II and III patients in their results; thus, the patients were placed into two groups (OD and ASD) composed of four categories: OD of Stage II impingement (494 patients), OD of Stage II and III impingement (204 patients), ASD of Stage II impingement (727 patients), and ASD of Stage II and III impingement (510 patients). The average duration of symptoms before surgery ranged from 6 months to 43 months in the OD group and 6 months to 61 months in the ASD group. The average age was 41.8 and 42.1 years, clinical follow-up 6 months to 62 months and 12 months to 41 months in the OD and ASD groups, respectively. The objective success rates were 83.3% versus 81.4% and the subjective success rates were 90.0% versus 89.3% for OD versus ASD, respectively. Return to work ranged from 43% to 100% in the OD group and 74% to 100% in the ASD group. Based on our review, the outcome from ASD is similar to OD. For persistent stage II primary impingement, we recommend starting with ASD and reserve OD for surgical failures. ASD allows earlier rehabilitation than OD because complete detachment of the deltoid is not performed, yet ASD is technically more demanding and has a long learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9809180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis        ISSN: 0018-5647


  12 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of surgery for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Panagiota Toliopoulos; François Desmeules; Jennifer Boudreault; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Pierre Frémont; Joy C MacDermid; Clermont E Dionne
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Treatment of impingement syndrome: a systematic review of the effects on functional limitations and return to work.

Authors:  Elske Faber; Judith I Kuiper; Alex Burdorf; Harald S Miedema; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

Review 3.  Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Salma Chaudhury; Stephen E Gwilym; Jane Moser; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Keun Man Shin
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2011-06-03

Review 5.  [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression].

Authors:  S Lerch; S Elki; M Jaeger; T Berndt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Masood Umer; Irfan Qadir; Mohsin Azam
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2012-05-31

7.  Does arthroscopic sub-acromial decompression really work for sub-acromial impingement syndrome: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rahul Bhattacharyya; Kimberley Edwards; Angus W Wallace
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The CSAW Study (Can Shoulder Arthroscopy Work?) - a placebo-controlled surgical intervention trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David Beard; Jonathan Rees; Ines Rombach; Cushla Cooper; Jonathan Cook; Naomi Merritt; Alastair Gray; Stephen Gwilym; Andrew Judge; Julian Savulescu; Jane Moser; Jenny Donovan; Marcus Jepson; Caroline Wilson; Irene Tracey; Karolina Wartolowska; Benjamin Dean; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  The painful shoulder: shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Yousaf Khan; Mathias Thomas Nagy; Joby Malal; Mohammad Waseem
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-06

10.  The Use of Physiotherapy among Patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: Impact of Sex, Socio-Demographic and Clinical Factors.

Authors:  David Høyrup Christiansen; Poul Frost; Lars Henrik Frich; Deborah Falla; Susanne Wulff Svendsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.