Literature DB >> 9808790

The direction of neurite growth in a weak DC electric field depends on the substratum: contributions of adhesivity and net surface charge.

A M Rajnicek1, K R Robinson, C D McCaig.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of the growth surface on the direction of Xenopus spinal neurite growth in the presence of a dc electric field of physiological magnitude. The direction of galvanotropism was determined by the substratum; neurites grew toward the negative electrode (cathode) on untreated Falcon tissue culture plastic or on laminin substrata, which are negatively charged, but neurites growing on polylysine, which is positively charged, turned toward the positive electrode (anode). Growth was oriented randomly on all substrata without an electric field. We tested the hypothesis that the charge of the growth surface was responsible for reversed galvanotropism on polylysine by growing neurons on tissue culture dishes with different net surface charges. Although neurites grew cathodally on both Plastek substrata, the frequency of anodal turning was greater on dishes with a net positive charge (Plastek C) than on those with a net negative charge (Plastek M). The charge of the growth surface therefore influenced the frequency of anodal galvanotropism but a reversal in surface charge was insufficient to reverse galvanotropism completely, possibly because of differences in the relative magnitude of the substratum charge densities. The influence of substratum adhesion on galvanotropism was considered by growing neurites on a range of polylysine concentrations. Growth cone to substratum adhesivity was measured using a blasting assay. Adhesivity and the frequency of anodal turning were graded over the range of polylysine concentrations (0 = 0.1 < 1 < 10 = 100 microg/ml). The direction of neurite growth in an electric field is therefore influenced by both substratum charge and growth cone-to-substratum adhesivity. These data are consistent with the idea that spatial or temporal variation in the expression of adhesion molecules in embryos may interact with naturally occurring electric fields to enhance growth cone pathfinding. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9808790     DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  20 in total

1.  Contact guidance in human dermal fibroblasts is modulated by population pressure.

Authors:  Jennifer Sutherland; Morgan Denyer; Stephen Britland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Polarization of hippocampal neurons with competitive surface stimuli: contact guidance cues are preferred over chemical ligands.

Authors:  Natalia Gomez; Shaochen Chen; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Embryonic zebrafish neuronal growth is not affected by an applied electric field in vitro.

Authors:  Peter Cormie; Kenneth R Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Alternating current electric fields of varying frequencies: effects on proliferation and differentiation of porcine neural progenitor cells.

Authors:  Ji-Hey Lim; Seth D McCullen; Jorge A Piedrahita; Elizabeth G Loboa; Natasha J Olby
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Electric field-induced astrocyte alignment directs neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  John K Alexander; Babette Fuss; Raymond J Colello
Journal:  Neuron Glia Biol       Date:  2006-05

6.  Robust neurite extension following exogenous electrical stimulation within single walled carbon nanotube-composite hydrogels.

Authors:  A N Koppes; K W Keating; A L McGregor; R A Koppes; K R Kearns; A M Ziemba; C A McKay; J M Zuidema; C J Rivet; R J Gilbert; D M Thompson
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Electrophoresis of cell membrane heparan sulfate regulates galvanotaxis in glial cells.

Authors:  Yu-Ja Huang; Paula Schiapparelli; Kristen Kozielski; Jordan Green; Emily Lavell; Hugo Guerrero-Cazares; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Peter Searson
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Neuro-protection and neuro-regeneration of the optic nerve: recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Kimberly K Gokoffski; Micalla Peng; Basheer Alas; Phillip Lam
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.710

9.  An incubatable direct current stimulation system for in vitro studies of Mammalian cells.

Authors:  Addie Hicks; Alyssa Panitch; Michael Caplan; James D Sweeney
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2012-08

10.  Scale of Carbon Nanomaterials Affects Neural Outgrowth and Adhesion.

Authors:  Eric Franca; Pit Fee Jao; Sheng-Po Fang; Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Liangbin Pan; Jung Hae Yoon; Yong-Kyu Yoon; Bruce C Wheeler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.