Literature DB >> 9808549

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral methotrexate and mercaptopurine in children with lower risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a joint children's cancer group and pediatric oncology branch study.

F M Balis1, J S Holcenberg, D G Poplack, J Ge, H N Sather, R F Murphy, M M Ames, M J Waskerwitz, D G Tubergen, S Zimm, G S Gilchrist, W A Bleyer.   

Abstract

We prospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate, mercaptopurine, and erythrocyte thioguanine nucleotide levels in a homogenous population of children with lower risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and correlated pharmacokinetic parameters with disease outcome. The maintenance therapy regimen included daily oral mercaptopurine (75 mg/m2) and weekly oral methotrexate (20 mg/m2). One hundred ninety-one methotrexate doses and 190 mercaptopurine doses were monitored in 89 patients. Plasma drug concentrations of both agents were highly variable. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of methotrexate ranged from 0.63 to 12 micromol*h/L, and the AUC of mercaptopurine ranged from 0.11 to 8 micromol*h/L. Drug dose, patient age, and duration of therapy did not account for the variability. Methotrexate AUC was significantly higher in girls than boys (P =.007). There was considerable intrapatient variability for both agents. Erythrocyte thioguanine nucleotide levels were also highly variable (range, 0 to 10 pmol/g Hgb) and did not correlate with mercaptopurine dose or AUC. A Cox regression analysis showed that mercaptopurine AUC was a marginally significant (P =.043) predictor of outcome, but a direct comparison of mercaptopurine AUC in the remission and relapsed patient groups failed to show a significant difference. Methotrexate and mercaptopurine plasma concentrations and erythrocyte thioguanine nucleotide levels were highly variable, but measurement of these pharmacokinetic parameters at the start of maintenance will not distinguish patients who are more likely to relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9808549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  24 in total

Review 1.  Role of red blood cells in pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Dirk Schrijvers
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Challenges and opportunities in childhood cancer drug development.

Authors:  Robin E Norris; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Plasma methotrexate, red blood cell methotrexate, and red blood cell folate values and outcome in children with precursor B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Wanda L Salzer; Naomi J Winick; Pierre Wacker; Xiaomin Lu; Meenakshi Devidas; Jonathan J Shuster; Donald H Mahoney; Stephen J Lauer; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.289

4.  Gene expression and thioguanine nucleotide disposition in acute lymphoblastic leukemia after in vivo mercaptopurine treatment.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zaza; Meyling Cheok; Wenjian Yang; John C Panetta; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling; William E Evans
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Oral cancer chemotherapy in paediatric patients: obstacles and potential for development and utilisation.

Authors:  W A Bleyer; M G Danielson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Implementation of TPMT testing.

Authors:  Lynne Lennard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Individually administered or co-prescribed thiopurines and mesalamines for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Giovanni-C Actis; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto; Muhammad Ayoubi; Nicola Leone; Gianfranco Tappero; Paola Pazienza; Floriano Rosina
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Induction of acute lymphocytic leukemia differentiation by maintenance therapy.

Authors:  T L Lin; M S Vala; J P Barber; J E Karp; B D Smith; W Matsui; R J Jones
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling of methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine in adults and children. Part 2: 6-mercaptopurine and its interaction with methotrexate.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling of methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine in adults and children. Part 1: methotrexate.

Authors:  Kayode Ogungbenro; Leon Aarons
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.