Literature DB >> 9807988

Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina.

R A Henderson1, S J Pocock, S J Sharp, K Nanchahal, M J Sculpher, M J Buxton, J R Hampton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) are both effective intervention strategies for patients with coronary heart disease. We report comparative long-term clinical and health-service cost findings for these interventions in the first Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-1) trial.
METHODS: 1011 patients with coronary heart disease (45% single-vessel, 55% multivessel) were randomly assigned initial treatment strategies of PTCA or CABG. Information on clinical events, subsequent intervention, symptomatic status, exercise testing, and use of health-care resources is available for a median 6.5 years of follow-up. Analyses were by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: The predefined primary endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 87 (17%) PTCA-group patients and 80 (16%) CABG-group patients (p=0.64). Similarly, there was no significant treatment difference in deaths alone (39 PTCA, 45 CABG), of which 46% were cardiac related. In both groups, the risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was more than five times higher in the first year than in subsequent years of follow-up. 26% of patients assigned PTCA subsequently also had CABG, and a further 19% required additional nonrandomised PTCA. Most of these reinterventions occurred within a year of randomisation, and from 3 years onwards the reintervention rate averaged 4% per year. In the CABG group the reintervention rate averaged 2% per year. The prevalence of angina was consistently higher in the PTCA group, with an absolute average 10% excess compared with the CABG group (p<0.001). Total health-service costs over 5 years showed no significant difference between initial strategies of PTCA and CABG (mean difference pounds sterling 426 [95% Cl -pounds sterling 383 to pounds sterling 1235]; p=0.30). The clinical and cost comparisons showed similar patterns for patients with single-vessel and multivessel disease.
INTERPRETATION: Initial strategies of PTCA and CABG led to similar long-term results in terms of survival and avoidance of myocardial infarction and to similar long-term health-care costs. Choice of approach, therefore, rests on weighing the more invasive nature of CABG against the greater risk of recurrent angina and reintervention over many years after PTCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807988     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03358-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  35 in total

Review 1.  Revascularization strategies in patients with diabetes: evolving concepts.

Authors:  J J Brennan; H S Cabin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Investigation and management of stable angina: revised guidelines 1998. Joint Working Party of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  D de Bono
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the stent era: a prospective study of all 9890 consecutive patients operated on in Scotland over a two year period.

Authors:  J P Pell; D Walsh; J Norrie; G Berg; A D Colquhoun; K Davidson; H Eteiba; A Faichney; A Flapan; K J Hogg; R R Jeffrey; K Jennings; J McArthur; P Mankad; K Oldroyd; A C Pell; I R Starkey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics: time to consider "intimal remodelling therapy"?

Authors:  P F Ludman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI.

Authors:  Tassilo Bonzel; Volker Schächinger; Hilmar Dörge
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zaher Fanari; Sandra A Weiss; Wei Zhang; Seema S Sonnad; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2015-01-22

7.  Outcomes of revascularization strategies for two-vessel coronary artery disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery in an era of improved pharmacotherapy and stenting.

Authors:  Jaroslav Hubacek; Sunil Kalla; P Diane Galbraith; Michelle M Graham; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Revascularization treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S G Foussas; G Z Tsiaousis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  Quality of life after PCI vs CABG among patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mouin S Abdallah; Kaijun Wang; Elizabeth A Magnuson; John A Spertus; Michael E Farkouh; Valentin Fuster; David J Cohen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Potential costs and effects of the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease in the UK.

Authors:  Venanzio Vella
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.