Literature DB >> 9807924

Uptake of screening for breast cancer in south Lancashire.

A Gatrell1, S Garnett, J Rigby, A Maddocks, M Kirwan.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To describe and explain variation among general practices in the uptake of screening for breast cancer.
DESIGN: Analysis of the variation in uptake of screening by general practice. Uptake rates are calculated and related to a social deprivation score created for each practice, and to the presence of at least one female general practitioner.
SETTING: South Lancashire Health Authority, England. PATIENTS: All women aged 50-64 y registered with Lancashire Family Health Services Authority and resident in South Lancashire in 1988-1995. MAIN
RESULTS: Variation in the uptake of screening for breast cancer during Round 1 of the national programme is explained partly by a deprivation score for each practice and by the presence of at least one female general practitioner. In Round 2 the deprivation index continues to explain variation, but the effect of a female GP has diminished. The number of hours worked by practice nurses has no effect on uptake of breast screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the uptake of breast cancer screening is closely related to social deprivation. Results suggest that the presence of a female general practitioner has a beneficial effect on uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807924     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  10 in total

1.  Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK.

Authors:  Ravi Maheswaran; Tim Pearson; Hannah Jordan; David Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Are caregiving responsibilities associated with non-attendance at breast screening?

Authors:  Heather Kinnear; Sheelah Connolly; Michael Rosato; Clare Hall; Adrian Mairs; Dermot O'Reilly
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The association between socio-demographic characteristics and adherence to breast and colorectal cancer screening: analysis of large sub populations.

Authors:  Rachel Wilf-Miron; Ronit Peled; Einat Yaari; Anna Vainer; Avi Porath; Ehud Kokia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Ethnicity, deprivation and screening: survival from breast cancer among screening-eligible women in the West Midlands diagnosed from 1989 to 2011.

Authors:  M Morris; L M Woods; N Rogers; E O'Sullivan; O Kearins; B Rachet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Ethnic disparities in knowledge of cancer screening programmes in the UK.

Authors:  Kathryn Robb; Jane Wardle; Sarah Stubbings; Amanda Ramirez; Joan Austoker; Una Macleod; Sara Hiom; Jo Waller
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Mottram; Wendy Lynn Knerr; Daniel Gallacher; Hannah Fraser; Lena Al-Khudairy; Abimbola Ayorinde; Sian Williamson; Chidozie Nduka; Olalekan A Uthman; Samantha Johnson; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Christopher Stinton; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.

Authors:  C von Wagner; A Good; D Wright; B Rachet; A Obichere; S Bloom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Enhanced invitation methods to increase uptake of NHS health checks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alice S Forster; Caroline Burgess; Lisa McDermott; Alison J Wright; Hiten Dodhia; Mark Conner; Jane Miller; Caroline Rudisill; Victoria Cornelius; Martin C Gulliford
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Higher breast cancer prevalence associated with higher socioeconomic status in the South Korean population; Has it resulted from overdiagnosis?

Authors:  Seong-Woo Choi; So-Yeon Ryu; Mi-Ah Han; Jong Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is a Patient's Current Address of Record a Reasonable Measure of Neighborhood Deprivation Exposure? A Case for the Use of Point in Time Measures of Residence in Clinical Care.

Authors:  Andrew J Knighton
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2018-05-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.