Literature DB >> 9807587

Small solid renal lesions: usefulness of power Doppler US.

M Jinzaki1, K Ohkuma, A Tanimoto, M Mukai, K Hiramatsu, M Murai, J Hata.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the vascular pattern at power Doppler ultrasonography (US) improves diagnostic accuracy in small solid renal lesions over that at gray-scale US.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gray-scale and power Doppler US were performed prospectively in 64 small (1.5-3.0-cm-diameter) solid renal lesions (26 renal cell carcinomas [RCCs], 34 angiomyolipomas, two oncocytomas, two pseudotumors). At gray-scale US, echogenicity and homogeneity of the lesion, an anechoic rim, intratumoral cysts, shadowing, or a central scar were sought. At power Doppler US, the vascular distribution was divided into four patterns.
RESULTS: Findings at gray-scale US included an anechoic rim or intratumoral cysts in 20 of 26 RCCs (77%) and the two oncocytomas. Shadowing was seen in seven of 34 angiomyolipomas (21%). Echogenicity, homogeneity, and a central scar were not pathognomonic. At power Doppler US, pattern 3 (peripheral) or 4 (mixed penetrating and peripheral) was seen in all RCCs, seven of 34 angiomyolipomas, and the two oncocytomas. Pattern 1 (intratumoral focal) or 2 (penetrating) was seen in 27 angiomyolipomas. Pattern 1 or 2 was characteristic of angiomyolipoma. The rate of correct diagnosis was significantly increased with combined US (78%) as compared to that with gray-scale (42%) or power Doppler (45%) US alone.
CONCLUSION: The vascular distribution at power Doppler US could add important information to gray-scale US findings for differential diagnosis of small solid renal lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807587     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

1.  Point Shear Wave Elastography Using Machine Learning to Differentiate Renal Cell Carcinoma and Angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  Hersh Sagreiya; Alireza Akhbardeh; Dandan Li; Rosa Sigrist; Benjamin I Chung; Geoffrey A Sonn; Lu Tian; Daniel L Rubin; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial experience.

Authors:  Scott Gerst; Lucy E Hann; Duan Li; Mithat Gonen; Satish Tickoo; Michael J Sohn; Paul Russo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  [Innovative ultrasound-based diagnosis of renal tumors].

Authors:  K F Stock; J Slotta-Huspenina; H Kübler; M Autenrieth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  US power Doppler of hepatic angiomyolipoma with low fat content.

Authors:  G Ascenti; M Gaeta; G Zimbaro; D Villari; A Blandino; E Scribano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Differentiation of renal cell carcinomas from other renal mass lesions.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 6.  The role of imaging in the active surveillance of small renal masses.

Authors:  P G K Wagstaff; P J Zondervan; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Characterization of renal cell carcinoma using agent detection imaging: comparison with gray-scale US.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Seung Hyup Kim; Hyuck Jae Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  An overview of non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosis of solid and cystic renal lesions.

Authors:  Ravinder Kaur; Mamta Juneja; A K Mandal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 9.  Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  S Houtzager; H Wijkstra; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  [CEUS-diagnosis of solid renal tumors].

Authors:  K Stock; H Kübler; T Maurer; J Slotta-Huspenina; K Holzapfel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.