Literature DB >> 9807586

Use of endorectal MR imaging to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

T A Manzone1, S B Malkowicz, J E Tomaszewski, M D Schnall, C P Langlotz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the ability of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to help predict postprostatectomy disease recurrence and, thereby, patient outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors evaluated 116 patients referred for prostate MR imaging during 1991 and 1992 who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy and for whom follow-up data through 1996 could be obtained. The MR reports, clinic charts, and pathology reports were reviewed. Disease recurrence was established by means of detectable levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after surgery.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (29%) had postoperative disease recurrence. Patients with recurrence had higher preoperative PSA values (P < .0001). These patients also more frequently had positive surgical margins (P = .0005), transcapsular tumor spread (P < .0001), seminal vesicle involvement (P = .0012), and tumors of advanced stage (P < .0001) and high grade (P = .0058). Of 13 patients whose MR examinations showed definite extracapsular disease, eight (62%) had disease recurrence. The recurrence rate when MR imaging indicated limited disease (24%) was similar to that when MR imaging showed possible microscopic extension (27%). An MR finding of definite extracapsular disease was 24% sensitive and 94% specific for the prediction of disease recurrence.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging findings of definite extracapsular spread of disease helped predict prostate tumor recurrence with high specificity, although with low sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807586     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Elizabeth M Genega; Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Martin P Smith; Herbert Y Kressel; Long Ngo; Martin G Sanda; William C Dewolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Kgi Park; Kyung Hwa Choi; Beom Jin Lim; Joo Hee Kim; Seung Wook Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  Role of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in treatment of patients with prostate cancer and in determining radical prostatectomy surgical margin status: report of a single surgeon's practice.

Authors:  Jian Qing Zhang; Kevin R Loughlin; Kelly H Zou; Steven Haker; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Prostate imaging in malignant and benign conditions.

Authors:  Aaron Sulman; Martin I Resnick
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.862

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.