Literature DB >> 9807578

Diaphragmatic and cardiac motion during suspended breathing: preliminary experience and implications for breath-hold MR imaging.

A E Holland1, J W Goldfarb, R R Edelman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate and quantify motion of the diaphragm and heart during suspended breathing at end inspiration and end expiration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 10 healthy adult volunteers, line scanning was performed to monitor the position of the diaphragm during a breath hold at end inspiration and end expiration, with a spatial and temporal resolution of 0.25 mm and 200 msec, respectively. Electrocardiographically gated, turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed to monitor movement of the diaphragm and heart.
RESULTS: During a breath hold, the diaphragm moved upward. At end expiration, the velocity of the diaphragm during suspended breathing was constant (mean, 0.15 mm/sec). At end inspiration, motion of the diaphragm during suspended breathing was more complex (range, 0.1-7.9 mm/sec). During a 20-second breath hold, mean displacement of the diaphragm was 25% of that during normal breathing. FLASH MR imaging revealed variations in the position of the heart during a breath hold. During suspended respiration, the heart did not return to the same position on consecutive heartbeats and, consequently, the margins of the heart typically moved inward.
CONCLUSION: Breath holding does not eliminate motion of the diaphragm. Changes in the motion of the diaphragm and transthoracic pressure during a breath hold result in complex movement of the heart and may cause blurring during breath-hold MR imaging.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807578     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  Early development of line-scan NMR imaging.

Authors:  A A Maudsley
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Adaptive and self-evaluating registration method for myocardial perfusion assessment.

Authors:  T Delzescaux; F Frouin; A De Cesare; S Philipp-Foliguet; R Zeboudj; M Janier; A Todd-Pokropek; A Herment
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Noninvasive coronary imaging for atherosclerosis in human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  Ahmed M Gharib; Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Roderic I Pettigrew; Colleen Hadigan
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

4.  Three-dimensional motion tracking of coronary arteries in biplane cineangiograms.

Authors:  Guy Shechter; Frédéric Devernay; Eve Coste-Manière; Arshed Quyyumi; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Cardiac MRI for clinicians: an overview.

Authors:  A J Duerinckx
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Respiratory motion of the heart from free breathing coronary angiograms.

Authors:  Guy Shechter; Cengizhan Ozturk; Jon R Resar; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 7.  [MR-based tridirectional flow imaging. Acquisition and 3D analysis of flows in the thoracic aorta].

Authors:  R Unterhinninghofen; S Ley; A Frydrychowicz; M Markl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Facilitated acquisition of whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography with visual feedback of respiration status.

Authors:  Tomohisa Okada; Shigehide Kuhara; Shotaro Kanao; Ayako Ninomiya; Saori Sato; Toshikazu Kamae; Kimio Gotoh; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Use of MRI to assess the prediction of heart motion with gross body motion in myocardial perfusion imaging by stereotracking of markers on the body surface.

Authors:  Michael A King; Joyoni Dey; Karen Johnson; Paul Dasari; Joyeeta M Mukherjee; Joseph E McNamara; Arda Konik; Cliff Lindsay; Shaokuan Zheng; Dennis Coughlin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Respiratory motion artefacts in dynamic liver MRI: a comparison using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Julian A Luetkens; Patrick A Kupczyk; Jonas Doerner; Rolf Fimmers; Winfried A Willinek; Hans H Schild; Guido M Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.