OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effects of a 2-year integrated health promotion-health protection work-site intervention on changes in dietary habits and cigarette smoking. METHODS: A randomized, controlled intervention study used the work site as the unit of intervention and analysis; it included 24 predominantly manufacturing work sites in Massachusetts (250-2500 workers per site). Behaviors were assessed in self-administered surveys (n = 2386; completion rates = 61% at baseline, 62% at final). Three key intervention elements targeted health behavior change: (1) joint worker-management participation in program planning and implementation, (2) consultation with management on work-site environmental changes, and (3) health education programs. RESULTS: Significant differences between intervention and control work sites included reductions in the percentage of calories consumed as fat (2.3% vs 1.5% kcal) and increases in servings of fruit and vegetables (10% vs 4% increase). The intervention had a significant effect on fiber consumption among skilled and unskilled laborers. No significant effects were observed for smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the size of the effects of this intervention are modest, on a populationwide basis effects of this size could have a large impact on cancer-related and coronary heart disease end points.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effects of a 2-year integrated health promotion-health protection work-site intervention on changes in dietary habits and cigarette smoking. METHODS: A randomized, controlled intervention study used the work site as the unit of intervention and analysis; it included 24 predominantly manufacturing work sites in Massachusetts (250-2500 workers per site). Behaviors were assessed in self-administered surveys (n = 2386; completion rates = 61% at baseline, 62% at final). Three key intervention elements targeted health behavior change: (1) joint worker-management participation in program planning and implementation, (2) consultation with management on work-site environmental changes, and (3) health education programs. RESULTS: Significant differences between intervention and control work sites included reductions in the percentage of calories consumed as fat (2.3% vs 1.5% kcal) and increases in servings of fruit and vegetables (10% vs 4% increase). The intervention had a significant effect on fiber consumption among skilled and unskilled laborers. No significant effects were observed for smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the size of the effects of this intervention are modest, on a populationwide basis effects of this size could have a large impact on cancer-related and coronary heart disease end points.
Authors: DeAnn Lazovich; David L Parker; Lisa M Brosseau; F Thomas Milton; Siobhan K Dugan; Wei Pan; Lynette Hock Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Martin Cherniack; Rob Henning; James A Merchant; Laura Punnett; Glorian R Sorensen; Gregory Wagner Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Deborah McLellan; Jack T Dennerlein; Nicolaas P Pronk; Jennifer D Allen; Leslie I Boden; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Dean Hashimoto; Anne Stoddard; Gregory R Wagner Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Deborah L McLellan; Erika L Sabbath; Jack T Dennerlein; Eve M Nagler; David A Hurtado; Nicolaas P Pronk; Gregory R Wagner Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 4.018