Literature DB >> 9807152

Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries.

C J Burstone1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis, treatment planning, and design of mechanics for the asymmetric patient requires the differentiation between problems of dental and skeletal origin. Although much information can be gleaned from a cephalometric analysis, the clinical examination and study models offer important clues in establishing the diagnosis of skeletal discrepancy. Abnormal and asymmetric axial inclinations can either produce a dental asymmetry or, if compensatory in nature, may mask an underlying skeletal problem. The role of axial inclination in diagnosis is applied to the following situations: subdivision cases, unilateral crossbites, midline discrepancies, arch form deviations, and frontal cants to the occlusal plane. The management of axial inclination asymmetries depends on the treatment plan. Nonextraction patients may require maintenance of asymmetric compensatory axial inclinations. Surgical and extraction patients can be treated to a more ideal symmetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807152     DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80017-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  20 in total

1.  Asymmetric dental arch treatment with Forsus fatigue appliances: Long-term results.

Authors:  Mehmet Akın; Emire Aybuke Erdur; Onur Öztürk
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Camouflage treatment for skeletal Class III patient with facial asymmetry using customized bracket based on CAD/CAM virtual orthodontic system.

Authors:  Ha Na Sha; Sun Young Lim; Sun Mi Kwon; Jung-Yul Cha
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Orthognathic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Severe Facial Asymmetry.

Authors:  Ezgi Atik; Ersoy Konaş; İlken Kocadereli
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  Class II malocclusion with accentuated occlusal plane inclination corrected with miniplate: a case report.

Authors:  Marcel Marchiori Farret; Milton M Benitez Farret
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

Review 5.  Facial asymmetry: a current review.

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

6.  Midfacial soft tissue changes after leveling Le Fort I osteotomy with differential reduction. Cone-beam computed tomography volume superimposition.

Authors:  Dae-Seok Hwang; Yong-Il Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Jae-Yeol Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Three-dimensional investigation of facial surface asymmetries in skeletal malocclusion patients before and after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  M Blockhaus; J Kochel; J Hartmann; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer; P Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Asymmetric transverse control of maxillary dentition with two midpalatal orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Hye-Young Kwon; Su-Jung Mah; Yoon-Goo Kang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Lateral Open Bite and Facial Asymmetry Treated with Asymmetric Lower Molar Extraction and Lingual Appliance: A Case Report.

Authors:  Vo Truong Nhu Ngoc; Nguyen Thi Thu Phuong; Nguyen Viet Anh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Derek A Sanders; Taranpreet K Chandhoke; Flavio A Uribe; Paul H Rigali; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.