Literature DB >> 9807150

Prevalence of orthodontic asymmetries.

R D Sheats1, S P McGorray, Q Musmar, T T Wheeler, G J King.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies of the occlusal status of the US population do not include the prevalence of orthodontic asymmetries. To estimate the magnitude of dental and facial asymmetries in adolescents with no history of orthodontic treatment, data were analyzed from two mass orthodontic screenings that had been conducted on public schoolchildren in Florida. An analysis of orthodontic records of patients in treatment at the Virginia Commonwealth University graduate orthodontic clinic provided prevalence data on dental and facial asymmetries in a population of orthodontic patients. In the Florida studies, the two screenings yielded 5,817 untreated children (mean age, 9.3 +/- 0.8 years) and 861 untreated children (mean age, 14.4 +/- 0.5 years). Sagittal molar asymmetry was found in 30% of the children in the first screening and in 23% in the second screening. Additional asymmetry assessments in the second screening showed 12% facial asymmetry and 21% noncoincidence of dental midlines. Among orthodontic patients, the most common asymmetry trait was mandibular midline deviation from the facial midline. This occurred in 62% of patients, followed, in descending order of frequency, by lack of dental midline coincidence (46%), maxillary midline deviation from the facial midline (39%), molar classification asymmetry (22%), maxillary occlusal asymmetry (20%), mandibular occlusal asymmetry (18%), facial asymmetry (6%), chin deviation (4%), and nose deviation (3%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807150     DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80015-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  12 in total

1.  Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Bruno F Gribel; Maria Perpétua M Freitas; Donald R Oliver; Ki Beom Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 2.  Facial asymmetry: a current review.

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

3.  Masseter myosin heavy chain composition varies with mandibular asymmetry.

Authors:  Gwénaël Raoul; Anthea Rowlerson; James Sciote; Emmanuel Codaccioni; Laurence Stevens; Claude-Alain Maurage; Alain Duhamel; Joël Ferri
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Prevalence of mandibular asymmetry in different skeletal sagittal patterns.

Authors:  Karine Evangelista; Ana Beatriz Teodoro; Jonas Bianchi; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Maria Alves Garcia Silva; José Valladares-Neto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.

Authors:  Je Uk Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Yoonji Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  3-D analysis of facial asymmetry in children with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Shane Rex Tolleson; Chung How Kau; Robert P Lee; Jeryl D English; Virpi Harila; Pertti Pirttiniemi; Marita Valkama
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Analyzing Menton Deviation in Posteroanterior Cephalogram in Early Detection of Temporomandibular Disorder.

Authors:  Trelia Boel; Ervina Sofyanti; Erliera Sufarnap
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-08-06

Review 8.  Association of midline discrepancy with tempromandibular joint disorder. A systematic review.

Authors:  Sandhya Jain; Neetu Sharma; Pallav Patni; Deshraj Jain
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2018-04-25

9.  Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Derek A Sanders; Taranpreet K Chandhoke; Flavio A Uribe; Paul H Rigali; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Is there an association between skeletal asymmetry and tooth absence?

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Keila Cristina Rausch Pereira; Maria Perpetua Mota Freitas
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.