Literature DB >> 980669

Away from a unisex psychology: individual differences in visual sensory and perceptual processes.

D McGuinness.   

Abstract

Four tests of visual perception were given to twenty-five men and twenty-five women. These were a test of acuity, threshold for four field positions, visual persistence, and a measure of comfortable brightness. Subjects also completed five personality questionnaires. In most measures, differences were found to be related to sex rather than to personality factors. In fact, the analyses performed suggest that persenality tests do not measure equivalent processes in men and women. Correlational anaylsis showed all visual functions to be independent of one another with the exception of photopic acuity and scotopic threshold, which were highly correlated. Two new findings on the visual system emerged which have not been reported elsewhere: (i) Four distinct dark adaptation curves were produced, and have been labeled as exponential, flat-exponential, linear, and plateau. All subjects fell into one of these categories and showed a consistent trend to exhibit these curves for all field positions. (ii) Highly significant differences were found in sensitivity for the four visual fields, the upper field was superior, followed by the right, then left, with the lower visual field considerably poorer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 980669     DOI: 10.1068/p050279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  The detectability, discriminability, and perceived magnitude of painful electrical shock.

Authors:  G B Rollman; G Harris
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

2.  Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice?

Authors:  John D Mollon; Jenny M Bosten; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Richer color experience in observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes.

Authors:  K A Jameson; S M Highnote; L M Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

4.  Risk factors for poor vision-related quality of life among cataract patients. Evaluation of baseline data.

Authors:  Irini P Chatziralli; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Vasileios G Peponis; Leonidas E Papazisis; Marilita M Moschos
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Sex & vision I: Spatio-temporal resolution.

Authors:  Israel Abramov; James Gordon; Olga Feldman; Alla Chavarga
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.027

6.  Sex-related differences in vision are heterogeneous.

Authors:  Albulena Shaqiri; Maya Roinishvili; Lukasz Grzeczkowski; Eka Chkonia; Karin Pilz; Christine Mohr; Andreas Brand; Marina Kunchulia; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.