Literature DB >> 9806650

Reconsideration of the lymph node metastasis pattern (N factor) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for primary liver carcinoma.

Y Nozaki1, M Yamamoto, I Ikai, Y Yamamoto, N Ozaki, H Fujii, K Nagahori, Y Matsumoto, Y Yamaoka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cholangiocarcinoma, no established method of analysis of lymph node metastasis has been reported with respect to the surgical outcome.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively examined the pattern of lymph node metastasis and the surgical outcome with reference to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM stage in 47 patients with cholangiocarcinoma who underwent complete tumor resection followed by a period of observation of >2 years.
RESULTS: The tumors were located in the left lobe of the liver in 32 patients, in the right lobe in 12 patients, and in both lobes in 3 patients. Lymph node metastasis was found in 15 patients (12 with left lobe tumors and 3 with right lobe tumors). Among those patients with the left lobe tumors, six had no metastasis in the hepatoduodenal ligament (regional lymph nodes), but did display metastasis to lymph nodes around the cardiac portion of the stomach or along the common hepatic artery (distant lymph nodes), whereas no such skip metastasis was found in those patients with right lobe tumors. The patients with lymph node metastasis showed a tendency toward a lower survival rate than those without metastasis (difference not statistically significant), but the patients with only regional lymph node metastasis showed no difference in survival rate compared with those with distant lymph node metastasis. Patients with mass-forming type tumors without bile duct invasion had less lymph node metastasis and a better survival than those with bile duct invasion.
CONCLUSIONS: The lymph node metastasis pattern of the UICC TNM classification, at least with respect to the regional lymph nodes, should be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9806650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takahiro Uenishi; Takatsugu Yamamoto; Shigekazu Takemura; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-15

Review 2.  [Pitfalls in the classification of liver tumors].

Authors:  C Wittekind
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Oncologic Impact of Lymph Node Dissection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Kim; Dai Hoon Han; Gi Hong Choi; Jin Sub Choi; Kyung Sik Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Predictive factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence in the liver following surgery.

Authors:  Shiro Miwa; Shinichi Miyagawa; Akira Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Akahane; Takenari Nakata; Motohiro Mihara; Kei Kusama; Junpei Soeda; Shinichiro Ogawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Impact of adjuvant chemoradiation on survival in patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Laura L Dover; Robert A Oster; Andrew M McDonald; Derek A DuBay; Thomas N Wang; Rojymon Jacob
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Surgical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masakazu Yamamoto; Shun-ichi Ariizumi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Patterns of regional lymph node involvement in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the left lobe.

Authors:  Jiro Okami; Keizo Dono; Masato Sakon; Masanori Tsujie; Nobuyasu Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Hiroaki Nagano; Koji Umeshita; Shoji Nakamori; Morito Monden
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Patterns and prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for surgical treatment of perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alfredo Guglielmi; Andrea Ruzzenente; Tommaso Campagnaro; Alessandro Valdegamberi; Fabio Bagante; Francesca Bertuzzo; Simone Conci; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors after surgical resection.

Authors:  Alfredo Guglielmi; Andrea Ruzzenente; Tommaso Campagnaro; Silvia Pachera; Alessandro Valdegamberi; Paola Nicoli; Alessandro Cappellani; Giulio Malfermoni; Calogero Iacono
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Clinicopathological prognostic factors and impact of surgical treatment of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shohachi Suzuki; Takanori Sakaguchi; Yoshihiro Yokoi; Kazuya Okamoto; Kiyotaka Kurachi; Yasuo Tsuchiya; Takuya Okumura; Hiroyuki Konno; Satoshi Baba; Satoshi Nakamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.