Literature DB >> 9806623

Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1.

P W Stratford1, J M Binkley, D L Riddle, G H Guyatt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study estimated the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire's (RMQ) change score that best classified patients as those who had achieved an important change and those who had not achieved an important change. The study also investigated whether the estimate of change was dependent on patients' initial scores. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The RMQ was administered to 226 patients with low back pain of less than 6 weeks' duration during their initial visit for physical therapy and following 3 to 6 weeks of treatment. A global rating of change was used to classify patients as those who had changed an important amount and those who had not changed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the RMQ change score that most accurately classified patients with respect to important change. This analysis was repeated for 5 overlapping subsamples of patients with initial scores 0 to 8, 5 to 12, 9 to 16, 13 to 20, and 17 to 24.
RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves increased when patients' initial scores were taken into account. Estimates of important change were 2, 4, 5, 8, and 8 for the initial score intervals mentioned above. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Important change appears to be dependent on patients' initial RMQ scores. Subsequent inquiry using different hypotheses would add support to the estimates of important change found in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9806623     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.11.1186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  81 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

2.  Translation and Adaptation of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) for Use in Denmark.

Authors:  Birgitte Rode Diness; Gritt Overbeck; Tina Duelund Hjortshøj; Trine Bjørg Hammer; Susanne Timshel; Else Sørensen; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Reliability and validity of a weight-bearing measure of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.

Authors:  Martin D Chisholm; Trevor B Birmingham; Janet Brown; Joy Macdermid; Bert M Chesworth
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Validation of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jung Sub Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Kuen Tak Suh; Jeung Il Kim; Jong Min Lim; Tae Sik Goh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Rasch analysis of 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Megan Davidson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Clinically important change in quality of life in epilepsy.

Authors:  S Wiebe; S Matijevic; M Eliasziw; P A Derry
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria Alba
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Caroline B Terwee; Nicole van der Roer; Dirk L Knol; Heleen Beckerman; Maarten Boers; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Sandra Eldridge; Ranjit Lall; Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Does physical activity change predict functional recovery in low back pain? Protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Hendrick; Stephan Milosavljevic; Melanie L Bell; Leigh Hale; Deirdre A Hurley; Suzanne M McDonough; Markus Melloh; David G Baxter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.