R Martínez-Monge1, S Nag, E W Martin. 1. Division of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of 125I brachytherapy in colorectal cancers recurrent in the pelvis and paraortics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 1989 to January 1997, 29 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma recurrent in the pelvis or the paraortic nodes were treated intraoperatively with permanent 125iodine seed implantation at the James Cancer Center of The Ohio State University (OSU). All patients had undergone prior surgery; 72% had prior EBRT. The implanted residual tumor volume was microscopic in 38% and gross in 62%. The implanted area (median 25 cc) received a median minimal peripheral dose of 140 Gy to total decay. An omental pedicle was used to minimize irradiation of the bowel. Five patients received additional postimplant EBRT (20-50 Gy; median 30 Gy). RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, and 4-year actuarial local-regional control rates were 38%, 17%, and 17%, respectively, with a median time to local failure of 11 months (95% CI 10-12 months). The first manifestation of disease progression in 52 % of the patients was local-regional. In addition, 22 patients (75%) developed distant metastases. The 1-, 2-, and 4-year actuarial overall survival rates were 70%, 35%, and 21%, (median = 18 months; 95% CI: 14-22 months). Overall survival was better for patients smaller volume implants (p = 0.007), with a lower total activity implanted (p = 0.0003), with a smaller number of implanted sites (p = 0.004), and with microscopic residual disease (p = 0.01). Patients receiving additional EBRT also had a better prognosis (p = 0.005). Local tumor progression was the cause of death in 34% of the patients who have died at the time of this report and 56% died of distant metastases. Of the patients, 13 (45%) experienced 15 toxic events, including 3 patients (10%) with enteric fistula. Neuropathy was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: 125I brachytherapy can be successfully used for salvage in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Patients with isolated, microscopic, or minimal gross residual disease requiring small-volume implants and those receiving additional EBRT have a better prognosis. Postimplant EBRT is now routinely added, even for previously irradiated patients, in an attempt to improve local control. Compared to IOERT and IOHDR, 125I brachytherapy is not associated with clinical neuropathy, probably due to the continuous low dose rate irradiation delivered by the 125I seeds.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of 125I brachytherapy in colorectal cancers recurrent in the pelvis and paraortics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 1989 to January 1997, 29 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma recurrent in the pelvis or the paraortic nodes were treated intraoperatively with permanent 125iodine seed implantation at the James Cancer Center of The Ohio State University (OSU). All patients had undergone prior surgery; 72% had prior EBRT. The implanted residual tumor volume was microscopic in 38% and gross in 62%. The implanted area (median 25 cc) received a median minimal peripheral dose of 140 Gy to total decay. An omental pedicle was used to minimize irradiation of the bowel. Five patients received additional postimplant EBRT (20-50 Gy; median 30 Gy). RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, and 4-year actuarial local-regional control rates were 38%, 17%, and 17%, respectively, with a median time to local failure of 11 months (95% CI 10-12 months). The first manifestation of disease progression in 52 % of the patients was local-regional. In addition, 22 patients (75%) developed distant metastases. The 1-, 2-, and 4-year actuarial overall survival rates were 70%, 35%, and 21%, (median = 18 months; 95% CI: 14-22 months). Overall survival was better for patients smaller volume implants (p = 0.007), with a lower total activity implanted (p = 0.0003), with a smaller number of implanted sites (p = 0.004), and with microscopic residual disease (p = 0.01). Patients receiving additional EBRT also had a better prognosis (p = 0.005). Local tumor progression was the cause of death in 34% of the patients who have died at the time of this report and 56% died of distant metastases. Of the patients, 13 (45%) experienced 15 toxic events, including 3 patients (10%) with enteric fistula. Neuropathy was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: 125I brachytherapy can be successfully used for salvage in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Patients with isolated, microscopic, or minimal gross residual disease requiring small-volume implants and those receiving additional EBRT have a better prognosis. Postimplant EBRT is now routinely added, even for previously irradiated patients, in an attempt to improve local control. Compared to IOERT and IOHDR, 125I brachytherapy is not associated with clinical neuropathy, probably due to the continuous low dose rate irradiation delivered by the 125I seeds.
Authors: Jun Jie Wang; Hui Shu Yuan; Jin Na Li; Wei Juan Jiang; Yu Liang Jiang; Su Qing Tian Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 2.571