Literature DB >> 9805725

Conceptual bases and methodology for the evaluation of women's and providers' perception of the quality of antenatal care in the WHO Antenatal Care Randomised Controlled Trial.

A Langer1, G Nigenda, M Romero, G Rojas, C Kuchaisit, M al-Osimi, E Orozco.   

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the conceptual bases and methodology used to assess women's and providers' perception of the quality of antenatal care, as part of a large randomised trial in four developing countries. Information has been obtained by applying both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The focus group discussions and in-depth interviews have contributed useful insights into the cultural milieu in which care is provided, users' and providers' expectations, and their concept of quality. Based on these findings, we developed two standardised questionnaires, one being administered to a representative sample of pregnant women (n = 1600) and the other for all care providers. In this paper we present some of the findings of the focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with women in one country as an example of the kind of information we have obtained. Women expressed their point of view concerning a reduced number of visits, type of provider, information that they get during clinical encounters and interpersonal relations with health professionals. The qualitative information, together with the data we obtain from the surveys, will highlight the aspects that will have be to considered if the new model of care is to be introduced on a routine basis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Arab Countries; Argentina; Asia; Behavior; Caribbean; Cross Sectional Analysis; Cuba; Data Collection; Delivery Of Health Care; Developing Countries; Health; Health Services; Health Services Evaluation; International Agencies; Latin America; Maternal Health Services; Maternal-child Health Services; Measurement; North America; Organization And Administration; Organizations; Prenatal Care; Primary Health Care; Program Evaluation; Programs; Psychological Factors; Quality Of Health Care; Reproductive Health; Research Methodology; Satisfaction; Saudi Arabia; South America; Southeastern Asia; Study Design; Thailand; Un; Western Asia; Who

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9805725     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00009.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  9 in total

1.  Do sociodemographic characteristics of pregnant women determine their perception of antenatal care quality?

Authors:  Olufemi T Oladapo; Modinat O Osiberu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-07-16

2.  Please understand when I cry out in pain: women's accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana.

Authors:  Lucia D'Ambruoso; Mercy Abbey; Julia Hussein
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Health education during antenatal care: the need for more.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Ateeq; Amal A Al-Rusaiess
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-02-18

Review 4.  Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Mannava; K Durrant; J Fisher; M Chersich; S Luchters
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.185

5.  Are Kazakhstani Women Satisfied with Antenatal Care? Implementing the WHO Tool to Assess the Quality of Antenatal Services.

Authors:  Marzhan A Dauletyarova; Yuliya M Semenova; Galiya Kaylubaeva; Gulshat K Manabaeva; Bakytkul Toktabayeva; Maryash S Zhelpakova; Oxana A Yurkovskaya; Aidos S Tlemissov; Galina Antonova; Andrej M Grjibovski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries.

Authors:  Ana Langer; José Villar; Mariana Romero; Gustavo Nigenda; Gilda Piaggio; Chusri Kuchaisit; Georgina Rojas; Muneera Al-Osimi; José Miguel Belizán; Ubaldo Farnot; Yagob Al-Mazrou; Guillermo Carroli; Hassan Ba'aqeel; Pisake Lumbiganon; Alain Pinol; Per Bergsjö; Leiv Bakketeig; Jo Garcia; Heinz Berendes
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Womens' opinions on antenatal care in developing countries: results of a study in Cuba, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Argentina.

Authors:  Gustavo Nigenda; Ana Langer; Chusri Kuchaisit; Mariana Romero; Georgina Rojas; Muneera Al-Osimy; José Villar; Jo Garcia; Yagob Al-Mazrou; Hassan Ba'aqeel; Guillermo Carroli; Ubaldo Farnot; Pisake Lumbiganon; José Belizán; Per Bergsjo; Leiv Bakketeig; Gunilla Lindmark
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Perceptions of antenatal care services by pregnant women attending government health centres in the Buea Health District, Cameroon: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Gregory Edie Halle Ekane Edie; Thomas Egbe Obinchemti; Emmanuel Njuma Tamufor; Martin Mafany Njie; Theophile Nana Njamen; Eric Akum Achidi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-05-21

9.  Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing.

Authors:  Maureen I Heaman; Wendy A Sword; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Amanda Bradford; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David C Young; Dawn A Kingston; Eileen K Hutton; Michael E Helewa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.