Literature DB >> 9805722

The WHO antenatal care randomised controlled trial: rationale and study design.

J Villar1, L Bakketeig, A Donner, Y al-Mazrou, H Ba'aqeel, J M Belizán, G Carroli, U Farnot, P Lumbiganon, G Piaggio, H Berendes.   

Abstract

The World Health Organisation and collaborating institutions in developing countries are conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new antenatal care (ANC) programme, consisting of tests, clinical procedures and follow-up actions scientifically demonstrated to be effective in improving maternal and newborn outcomes. These activities are distributed, for practical reasons, over four visits during the course of pregnancy and are aimed at achieving predetermined goals. The study is taking place in four countries, Argentina, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Thailand. Recruitment of study subjects started on 1 May 1996. All 53 ANC clinical units had been enrolled by December 1996. Clinics in each country were randomly allocated (cluster randomisation) to provide either the new programme or the traditional programme currently in use. Approximately 24,000 women presenting for ANC at these clinics over an average period of 18 months will have been recruited. As women attending the control clinics receive the 'best standard treatment' as currently offered in these clinics, individual informed consent is requested only from women attending the intervention clinics. Authorities of the corresponding health districts and all participating clinics have provided written institutional informed consent before randomisation. The primary outcome of the trial in relation to maternal conditions is the rate of a morbidity indicator index, defined as the presence of at least one of the following conditions for which ANC is relevant: (a) pre-eclampsia or eclampsia during pregnancy or within 24 h of delivery; (b) postpartum anaemia (haemoglobin < 90 g/L); or (c) severe urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis, defined as an episode requiring antibiotic treatment and/or hospitalisation. The primary fetal outcome is the rate of low birthweight (< 2500 g). Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes are expected for approximately 10% of the control group. Several maternal and perinatal secondary outcomes are also considered. A comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis and women's and providers' satisfaction evaluation are performed concurrently with the trial. Health-care programmes should be rigorously evaluated by randomised controlled trials, which are feasible in developing countries and should be conducted before introducing new treatments or health interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Arab Countries; Argentina; Asia; Caribbean; Cross Sectional Analysis; Cuba; Data Collection; Delivery Of Health Care; Developing Countries; Health; Health Services; International Agencies; Latin America; Maternal Health Services; Maternal-child Health Services; North America; Organization And Administration; Organizations; Prenatal Care; Primary Health Care; Program Evaluation; Programs; Reproductive Health; Research Methodology; Saudi Arabia; South America; Southeastern Asia; Study Design; Thailand; Un; Western Asia; Who

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9805722     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00006.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  7 in total

Review 1.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Gp Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  A new measurement for optimal antenatal care: determinants and outcomes in Cameroon.

Authors:  Lawrence C E Mbuagbaw; Rosa Gofin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-11

Review 3.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-16

Review 4.  Health education during antenatal care: the need for more.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Ateeq; Amal A Al-Rusaiess
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-02-18

Review 5.  Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Nancy Medley; Andrea J Darzi; Marty Richardson; Kesso Habiba Garga; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Antenatal care packages with reduced visits and perinatal mortality: a secondary analysis of the WHO Antenatal Care Trial.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Ndema Abu Habib; João Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Hassan S Baaqeel; Pisake Lumbiganon; Gilda Piaggio; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries.

Authors:  Ana Langer; José Villar; Mariana Romero; Gustavo Nigenda; Gilda Piaggio; Chusri Kuchaisit; Georgina Rojas; Muneera Al-Osimi; José Miguel Belizán; Ubaldo Farnot; Yagob Al-Mazrou; Guillermo Carroli; Hassan Ba'aqeel; Pisake Lumbiganon; Alain Pinol; Per Bergsjö; Leiv Bakketeig; Jo Garcia; Heinz Berendes
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.