Literature DB >> 9805318

Identification of the optimal parameters for recording cortical evoked potentials to human oesophageal electrical stimulation.

A R Hobson1, Q Aziz, P L Furlong, J D Barlow, J Bancewicz, D G Thompson.   

Abstract

Cortical evoked potentials in response to stimulation of the oesophagus may prove to be a powerful technique for assessing the oesophageal afferent pathway in health and disease. However, in order to maximize the potential of this technique it is essential that the optimal parameters for recording oesophageal CEP are established. The aim was to determine the optimal parameters required to record reproducible CEP. CEP were recorded from the vertex in eight subjects (age range 23-44 years). Electrical stimulation was performed 5 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter using a bipolar ring electrode at 0.2 Hz. Protocol 1: to determine the stimulation intensity which generates the largest amplitude and shortest latency, two runs of 50 stimuli were applied at increasing intensities. Protocol 2: to determine the number of stimuli for optimal signal to noise ratio, 10 runs of 50 stimuli were recorded. Individual runs were averaged. Protocol 3: to determine the optimal inter-run interval, CEP evoked by 200 stimuli were averaged using randomly chosen inter-run intervals. Protocol 4: CEP reproducibility using parameters determined from Protocols 1-3 was assessed in three subjects on three separate occasions. The results were as follows: Protocol 1; P1 latency was shortest and P1-N1 amplitude largest at an intensity of 75% above threshold. Protocol 2; optimal signal-to-noise was achieved by averaging four runs of 50 stimuli. Protocol 3; the optimal interstudy interval was 10 min. Protocol 4; highly reproducible CEP were obtained in all individuals. Using these optimal parameters, it is possible to obtain highly reproducible oesophageal CEP to ES which can now be used for clinical study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9805318     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.1998.00116.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  8 in total

1.  Cortical processing of human somatic and visceral sensation.

Authors:  Q Aziz; D G Thompson; V W Ng; S Hamdy; S Sarkar; M J Brammer; E T Bullmore; A Hobson; I Tracey; L Gregory; A Simmons; S C Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A bi-directional assessment of the human brain-anorectal axis.

Authors:  J M Remes-Troche; K Tantiphlachiva; A Attaluri; J Valestin; T Yamada; S Hamdy; S S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Short latency cerebral response evoked by painful electrical stimulation applied to the human sigmoid colon and to the convergent referred somatic pain area.

Authors:  Petra Rössel; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; David Niddam; Andrew C N Chen; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Model for Electrical Field Distribution in the Human Esophagus during Stimulation with Patch and Ring Electrodes.

Authors:  Christina Brock; Romulus E Lontis; Flemming H Lundager; Peter Kunwald; Asbjørn M Drewes; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Perceptual wind-up in the human oesophagus is enhanced by central sensitisation.

Authors:  S Sarkar; C J Woolf; A R Hobson; D G Thompson; Q Aziz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Different brain activation under left and right ventricular stimulation: an fMRI study in anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Hideaki Suzuki; Akira Sumiyoshi; Ryuta Kawashima; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gamma oscillatory amplitude encodes stimulus intensity in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  H E Rossiter; S F Worthen; C Witton; S D Hall; P L Furlong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Translational aspects of rectal evoked potentials: a comparative study in rats and humans.

Authors:  Thomas Dahl Nissen; Christina Brock; Carina Graversen; Steven J Coen; Leif Hultin; Qasim Aziz; Jens Lykkesfeldt; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.052

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.