Literature DB >> 9804445

Adverse effects of contrast media: incidence, prevention and management.

H S Thomsen1, W H Bush.   

Abstract

Although contrast media are relatively well tolerated, a non-life-threatening, moderate reaction requiring some treatment occurs in 1 to 2% of patients receiving ionic high-osmolar contrast media and in 0.2 to 0.4% of patients receiving non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media. Severe, life-threatening reactions can be expected in about 0.2% of patients after injection of ionic high-osmolar and 0.04% after non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media. Prompt recognition and treatment are invaluable in blunting an adverse response of a patient to radiographic contrast material, and may prevent a reaction from becoming severe or even life-threatening. Some reactions can be prevented by pretreatment before administration of contrast media. Knowledge, training and preparation are crucial in guaranteeing appropriate and effective therapy in the event of an adverse contrast-related event. Radiologists and their staff should review treatment protocols regularly so that each can accomplish his or her role efficiently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9804445     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199819040-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  53 in total

1.  Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees, American Heart Association. Part III. Adult advanced cardiac life support.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Steroids: theoretical and experimental basis for utilization in prevention of contrast media reactions.

Authors:  E C Lasser; J Lang; M Sovak; W Kolb; S Lyon; A E Hamlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Contrast nephropathy.

Authors:  H S Thomsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Radiol       Date:  1990-12

4.  Predictable and unpredictable adverse reactions to uroangiographic contrast media.

Authors:  A Spinazzi; A Davies; P Tirone; G Rosati
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Increased incidence of hypersensitivity to iodine-containing radiographic contrast media after interleukin-2 administration.

Authors:  A A Zukiwski; C L David; J Coan; S Wallace; J U Gutterman; G M Mavligit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The use of iohexol in patients with previous reactions to ionic contrast material. A multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  R L Siegle; R A Halvorsen; J Dillon; M L Gavant; E Halpern
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  High-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media. An update on frequency of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  H S Thomsen; S Dorph
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Beta-blockade in stinging insect anaphylaxis.

Authors:  M Ingall; G Goldman; L B Page
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Acute reactions to urographic contrast media.

Authors:  P Davies; M B Roberts; J Roylance
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-05-24

10.  Mortality during excretory urography: Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  G W Hartman; R R Hattery; D M Witten; B Williamson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  16 in total

1.  Management of acute adverse reactions to contrast media.

Authors:  Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Roles of intracellular Ca2+ and cyclic AMP in mast cell histamine release induced by radiographic contrast media.

Authors:  Mami Saito; Yoshinori Itoh; Takahisa Yano; Toshiaki Sendo; Takeshi Goromaru; Naoko Sakai; Ryozo Oishi
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  The use of contrast media.

Authors:  Mark O Baerlocher; Murray Asch; Andy Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database.

Authors:  Roberto Leone; Anita Conforti; Mauro Venegoni; Domenico Motola; Ugo Moretti; Ilaria Meneghelli; Alfredo Cocci; Giulia Sangiorgi Cellini; Stefania Scotto; Nicola Montanaro; Giampaolo Velo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast media: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Saravanan Namasivayam; Mannudeep K Kalra; William E Torres; William C Small
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-05-11

6.  Acute adverse reactions to iopromide vs iomeprol: a retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting from a radiology department.

Authors:  M García; U Aguirre; A Martinez; B Ruiz; U Lertxundi; C Aguirre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Gadolinium to the rescue for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Shailesh Male; Tapan Mehta; Huseyin Tore; Coridon Quinn; Andrew W Grande; Ramachandra P Tummala; Bharathi D Jagadeesan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast media.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Suh-Young Lee; Young Hun Choi; Chang Min Park; Hye-Ryun Kang; Sang-Heon Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media: premedication considerations for patients at risk.

Authors:  Jennifer G Schopp; Ramesh S Iyer; Carolyn L Wang; Jonelle M Petscavage; Angelisa M Paladin; William H Bush; Manjiri K Dighe
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-02-21

Review 10.  Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media.

Authors:  Wendy Bottinor; Pritam Polkampally; Ion Jovin
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.