Literature DB >> 9804234

Sperm retrieval and fertilization in repeated percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration.

B Rosenlund1, G Westlander, M Wood, K Lundin, E Reismer, T Hillensjö.   

Abstract

Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) for retrieval of spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a new simplified technique in the treatment of men with obstructive azoospermia. There has been a fear that the PESA procedure, being blind, could cause damage to the epididymal duct system and make it impossible to retrieve spermatozoa if a repeated procedure is required. We report here on repeated PESA procedures from the same unilateral epididymis. Twenty-seven men with obstructive azoospermia were investigated retrospectively regarding sufficiency of the number of motile spermatozoa for ICSI, fertilization rate (FR) and possibility of collecting spermatozoa for cryopreservation in repeated PESA procedures. Sufficient motile spermatozoa for ICSI were found in a similar proportion of men at the first two attempts: 91 and 89% respectively. Fertilization rate and the possibility of collecting spermatozoa for cryopreservation were also similar at the first two PESA procedures: 62 versus 67% and 33 versus 33% respectively. At the third procedure, motile spermatozoa for ICSI were retrieved in 86% (6/7), FR was 47% and spermatozoa were cryopreserved in one case. Two men underwent a fourth PESA. In both cases, a sufficient number of motile spermatozoa for ICSI was found and FR was 62%. This study shows that in men with obstructive azoospermia, PESA can be repeated on the same unilateral epididymis up to three times, with good opportunity of retrieving sufficient motile spermatozoa for ICSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9804234     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Sperm retrieval, fertilization, and pregnancy outcome in repeated testicular sperm aspiration.

Authors:  G Westlander; B Rosenlund; B Söderlund; M Wood; C Bergh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The outcome of ART in males with impaired spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Vs Mangoli; Sp Dandekar; Sk Desai; Rv Mangoli
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2008-07

Review 3.  An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; José Eduardo Orosz; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 4.  Predictive factors for sperm retrieval and sperm injection outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: do etiology, retrieval techniques and gamete source play a role?

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 5.  Current practices in fertility preservation in male cancer patients.

Authors:  E Charles Osterberg; Ranjith Ramasamy; Puneet Masson; Robert E Brannigan
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2014-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.