Literature DB >> 9803449

Agreement among raters in assessment of physiologic waveforms recorded by a cardiorespiratory monitor for home use. Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation (CHIME) Study Group.

M J Corwin1, G Lister, J M Silvestri, M Peucker, L J Brooks, S L Ward, C E Hunt, M R Neuman, D H Crowell, T Colton.   

Abstract

There are numerous reports of cardiorespiratory patterns in infants on home monitors, but no data to determine whether "experts" agree on the description of these patterns. Therefore, we evaluated agreement among four experienced investigators and five trained technicians who assessed independently the same sample of physiologic waveforms recorded from infants enrolled in a multicenter study. The monitor used respiratory inductance plethysmography and recorded waveforms for apnea > or = 16 s or a heart rate < 80 beats/min for > or = 5 s. The investigators and technicians initially assessed 88 waveforms. After additional training, the technicians assessed another 113 additional waveforms. In categorizing waveforms as apnea present or absent, agreement among technicians improved considerably with additional training (kappa 0.65 to 0.85). For categorizing waveforms as having bradycardia present versus absent, the trends were the same. Agreement in measurement of apnea duration also improved considerably with additional training (intraclass correlation 0.33-0.83). Agreement in measurement of bradycardia duration was consistently excellent (intraclass correlation 0.86-0.99). Total agreement was achieved among technicians with additional training for measurement of the lowest heart rate during a bradycardia. When classifying apnea as including > or = 1, > or = 2, > or = 3, or > or = 4 out-of-phase breaths, agreement was initially low, but after additional training it improved, especially in categorization of apneas with > or = 3 or > or = 4 out-of-phase breaths (kappa 0.67 and 0.94, respectively). Although researchers and clinicians commonly describe events based on cardiorespiratory recordings, agreement amongst experienced individuals may be poor, which can confound interpretation. With clear guidelines and sufficient training raters can attain a high level of agreement in describing cardiorespiratory events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9803449     DOI: 10.1203/00006450-199811000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  4 in total

1.  Non-invasive monitoring of chewing and swallowing for objective quantification of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Edward Sazonov; Stephanie Schuckers; Paulo Lopez-Meyer; Oleksandr Makeyev; Nadezhda Sazonova; Edward L Melanson; Michael Neuman
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Longitudinal assessment of hemoglobin oxygen saturation in preterm and term infants in the first six months of life.

Authors:  Carl E Hunt; Michael J Corwin; Debra E Weese-Mayer; Sally L Davidson Ward; Rangasamy Ramanathan; George Lister; Larry R Tinsley; Tim Heeren; Denis Rybin
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 3.  Recommended clinical evaluation of infants with an apparent life-threatening event. Consensus document of the European Society for the Study and Prevention of Infant Death, 2003.

Authors:  André Kahn
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Short-term event recording as a measure to rule out false alarms and to shorten the duration of home monitoring in infants.

Authors:  Heinz Zotter; Renate Schenkeli; Ronald Kurz; Reinhold Kerbl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.704

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.