Literature DB >> 9803291

The vital few meet the trivial many: unexpected use patterns in a monographs collection.

J D Eldredge1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test three related hypotheses about monographs circulation at academic health sciences libraries: (1) Juran's "Vital Few" Principle, sometimes incorrectly referred to as the "Pareto Principle"; (2) most (> 30%) new monographs will not circulate within four years; and, (3) Trueswell's 20/80 rule concerning intensity of monographs circulation.
METHODS: Retrospective circulation study conducted at a major academic health sciences library in November 1997 on monographs acquired during 1993, utilizing an online review file.
RESULTS: Unexpectedly, most monographs (84%) had circulated at least once in the four years following acquisition. Combining circulation and in-house data revealed that 90.7% of the monographs acquired in 1993 had been used at least once. Small percentages of these monographs produced disproportionately high circulation levels.
CONCLUSION: Monographs circulation rates confirm Juran's Vital Few principle. Most monographs circulated at least once in contrast to results reported by the Pittsburgh Study or other studies reported by Hardesty and Fenske. The results do not comply with Trueswell's 20/80 ratio rule. Further research needs to investigate the effects of low students to books ratios and problem-based learning (PBL) curricula upon monographs utilization.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9803291      PMCID: PMC226441     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  7 in total

1.  Book availability as a performance measure of a library: an analysis of the effectiveness of a health sciences library.

Authors:  H F Rashid
Journal:  J Am Soc Inf Sci       Date:  1990-10

2.  MODERATELY AND HEAVILY USED BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS.

Authors:  T P FLEMING; F G KILGOUR
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1964-01

3.  Why should doctors read medical books?

Authors:  E J Cassell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Preparing medical libraries for use by students in PBL curricula.

Authors:  J A Rankin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  A study of library use in problem-based and traditional medical curricula.

Authors:  J G Marshall; D Fitzgerald; L Busby; G Heaton
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1993-07

Review 6.  Evaluation of monograph selection in a health sciences library.

Authors:  R E Fenske
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1994-07

7.  Library use and academic achievement among medical students.

Authors:  H Brazier; R M Conroy
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.251

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Monograph use at an academic health sciences library: the first three years of shelf life.

Authors:  D D Blecic
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-04

2.  Online tables of contents for books: effect on usage.

Authors:  R C Morris
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2001-01

3.  Historically significant journal articles: their identification in older bound journal volumes designated for weeding and the creation of new access to these articles.

Authors:  J D Eldredge; H Guenther
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2001-01

4.  Cohort studies in health sciences librarianship.

Authors:  Jonathan Eldredge
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.