Literature DB >> 9803252

Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: past, present and future.

M J Solomon1, R S McLeod.   

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with their prospective definition of methods and outcome measures, double-blind assessment of outcomes and unbiased selection of subjects and controls, provide the best possible evidence for deciding the value of a medical or surgical intervention. Few surgical studies are designed as RCTs, and those that are should be of a higher quality. The lack of good surgical RCTs may be a result of surgeons lacking the necessary training, expertise and desire to perform RCTs, inadequate funding from granting agencies, difficulties in securing patient consent or a lack of sufficient patient numbers. If an RCT is not feasible for a particular study, then alternative research designs, such as prospective matched-pair trials, may need to be better developed and used. If RCTs can be performed, other strategies to increase the number and quality of RCTs may be needed: Education of surgeons in clinical research methods Improved funding of surgical RCTs Compulsory evaluation of new techniques and technology before their general adoption is permitted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9803252     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb126809.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  21 in total

1.  Seven alternatives to evidence based medicine.

Authors:  D Isaacs; D Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999 Dec 18-25

2.  Neurovascular compression in the thoracic outlet syndrome.

Authors:  M Cherington; A J Wilbourn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Evidence-based librarianship: an overview.

Authors:  J D Eldredge
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-10

Review 4.  The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Jacquier; Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of effects in randomized controlled trials with observational studies in digestive surgery.

Authors:  Satoru Shikata; Takeo Nakayama; Yoshinori Noguchi; Yoshinori Taji; Hisakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Rong Chu; Richard Whitlock; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Assuring quality in HPB surgery--efficacy and safety.

Authors:  G J Maddern
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Practical tips for surgical research: introduction to the series.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review.

Authors:  A C Yao; A Khajuria; C F Camm; E Edison; R Agha
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Statistics: The stethoscope of a thinking urologist.

Authors:  Arun S Sivanandam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.