Literature DB >> 9802858

Outcomes research: a review.

P C Gerszten1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review the history of the medical outcomes movement as well as the methodologies used in outcomes research. CONCEPT: Outcomes research refers to a genre of clinical investigation that emphasizes the measurement of patient health outcomes, including the patient's symptoms, functional status, quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, and health care costs. RATIONALE: Outcomes research evolved from studies that demonstrated the presence of wide geographic variations in the practice of medicine and surgery. Such differences in utilization were unaccompanied by any discernible difference in patient outcomes. With escalating health care costs, there has been a growing interest in measuring the outcomes of medical intervention to determine the quality and appropriateness of medical care. DISCUSSION: Outcomes may be measured both directly and indirectly, over differing periods of time, and with varying degrees of objectivity, reliability, and validity. Current research has focused on quality of life issues, which include the extent to which a patient's usual or expected physical, emotional, and social well-being have been affected by a medical condition or treatment. The true value of health care can be determined only by a systematic examination of patient outcomes. To accomplish this goal, methods are required that are relatively unfamiliar to many clinical researchers. Future clinical research should include patient-oriented outcome measures that would otherwise focus solely on physiological or anatomic outcomes. Such information will be essential in determining which medical and surgical treatment strategies should be abandoned and which will gain acceptance in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9802858     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199811000-00072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary surgical outcome for skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Chien-Min Chen; Abel Po-Hao Huang; Lu-Ting Kuo; Yong-Kwang Tu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  A multicenter evaluation of utility of chest computed tomography and bone scans in liver transplant candidates with stages I and II hepatoma.

Authors:  Baburao Koneru; Lewis W Teperman; Cosme Manzarbeitia; Marcelo Facciuto; Kyunghee Cho; David Reich; Patricia Sheiner; Adrian Fisher; Khristian Noto; Alec Goldenberg; Maria Korogodsky; Donna Campbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Acquired Personality Disturbances After Meningioma Resection Are Strongly Associated With Impaired Quality of Life.

Authors:  Joseph Barrash; Taylor J Abel; Katrina L Okerstrom-Jezewski; Mario Zanaty; Joel E Bruss; Kenneth Manzel; Matthew Howard; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Which factors determine subjective improvement following pelvic organ prolapse 1 year after surgery?

Authors:  Sameh S S Lawndy; Kirsten B Kluivers; Alfredo L Milani; Mariella I J Withagen; Jan C M Hendriks; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Comparative Study of the Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using the Tubular Retractor System Based on the VAS, ODI, and SF-36.

Authors:  Sang Mok Yoon; Soon-Seob Ahn; Ki Hong Kim; Young Don Kim; Jae Hoon Cho; Dae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.