Literature DB >> 9802349

Bile duct brushing cytology: statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria.

A A Renshaw1, R Madge, M Jiroutek, S R Granter.   

Abstract

Recent studies based on multivariate analysis have identified cytologic features that may be of value in the diagnosis of malignancy in bile duct brushings. We sought to assess the reproducibility and accuracy of these criteria. Three different observers used 4 sets of criteria that included 9 cytologic features to review 165 bile duct brushing specimens with available follow-up data. An overall assessment of malignancy and evaluation for the presence of chromatin clumping had excellent reproducibility (3-way kappa values of 0.708 and 0.629, respectively). Evaluation for the presence of enlarged nuclei, increased nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio, nuclear molding, and loss of honeycombing showed moderate reproducibility. An overall assessment of malignancy was a better predictor of the presence of malignancy than any other criteria, with a sensitivity of 36.2% and a specificity of 95%. Retrospective analysis demonstrated that the criteria of chromatin clumping, increased nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio, and either nuclear molding or loss of honeycombing had similar sensitivity and specificity as the overall assessment of malignancy (sensitivity = 35.2%, specificity = 95%). An overall assessment of malignancy or the criteria of chromatin clumping, increased nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio, and either nuclear molding or loss of honeycombing are reproducible cytologic criteria that accurately predict malignancy in bile duct brushings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9802349     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/110.5.635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  8 in total

1.  Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.

Authors:  Vaidehi Avadhani; Ezgi Hacihasanoglu; Bahar Memis; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Krisztina Z Hanley; Uma Krishnamurti; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Lauren M Daniels; Alexa A Freedman; Michael Goodman; Volkan Adsay; Michelle D Reid
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Biliary multifocal chromosomal polysomy and cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Authors:  John E Eaton; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Gregory J Gores; Elizabeth J Atkinson; James H Tabibian; Mark D Topazian; Andrea A Gossard; Kevin C Halling; Benjamin R Kipp; Konstantinos N Lazaridis
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Early diagnosis of pancreatobiliary duct malignancies by brush cytology and biopsy.

Authors:  Gábor Elek; Tibor Gyökeres; Eszter Schäfer; Mária Burai; Ferenc Pintér; Akos Pap
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Role of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, Cholangioscopic Biopsies, and EUS-FNA in the Evaluation of Biliary Strictures.

Authors:  Christian Brooks; Valerie Gausman; Chanthel Kokoy-Mondragon; Khushboo Munot; Sunil P Amin; Amit Desai; Claudine Kipp; John Poneros; Amrita Sethi; Frank G Gress; Michel Kahaleh; Vundavalli V Murty; Reem Sharaiha; Tamas A Gonda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  False negative and false positive rates in common bile duct brushing cytology, a single center experience.

Authors:  Bita Geramizadeh; Maryam Moughali; Atefeh Shahim-Aein; Soghra Memari; Ziba Ghetmiri; Alireza Taghavi; Kamran Bagheri Lankarani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2018

6.  Role of biliary tract cytology in the evaluation of extrahepatic cholestatic jaundice.

Authors:  Mamta Gupta; Radha R Pai; Devi Dileep; Sandeep Gopal; Suresh Shenoy
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.

Authors:  Martha B Pitman; Barbara A Centeno; Syed Z Ali; Muriel Genevay; Ed Stelow; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; C Max Schmidt; William R Brugge; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Genetic Abnormalities in Biliary Brush Samples for Distinguishing Cholangiocarcinoma from Benign Strictures in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Authors:  Margriet R Timmer; Chiu T Lau; Sybren L Meijer; Paul Fockens; Erik A J Rauws; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Silvia Calpe; Kausilia K Krishnadath
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-03       Impact factor: 2.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.